4.1 sec in total
426 ms
3.3 sec
440 ms
Visit crayon.com now to see the best up-to-date Crayon content for Qatar and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about crayon.com
Begin your digital transformation journey. Reduce cloud costs. Optimize your IT environment. Rightsize your digital ecosystem.
Visit crayon.comWe analyzed Crayon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
crayon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value2,610 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.16
73/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
426 ms
1345 ms
651 ms
43 ms
220 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Crayon.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Crayon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 667.2 kB (63%)
1.1 MB
397.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Crayon.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 477.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Crayon needs image optimization as it can save up to 87.6 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 340.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 340.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crayon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 178.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (16%)
63
53
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crayon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
crayon.com
426 ms
www.crayon.com
1345 ms
css.css
651 ms
jsapi
43 ms
require.js
220 ms
worldmap.js
227 ms
austria.png
111 ms
denmark.png
112 ms
finland.png
114 ms
france.png
247 ms
germany.png
247 ms
iceland.png
247 ms
india.png
248 ms
malaysia.png
248 ms
netherlands.png
249 ms
norway.png
372 ms
philippines.png
374 ms
portugal.png
372 ms
singapore.png
373 ms
spain.png
371 ms
sweden.png
372 ms
switzerland.png
480 ms
uae.png
483 ms
united_kingdom.png
486 ms
united_states.png
487 ms
global_icon.png
484 ms
logo.jpg
597 ms
sam-iq-transnew.png
592 ms
ms-logo-black-transl.png
600 ms
cloud-iq-resized.png
595 ms
ms-logo-small-white.png
603 ms
220px-office_365_logo.png
605 ms
timer.png
700 ms
puzzle.png
707 ms
cloud.png
714 ms
rubick.png
712 ms
head.png
720 ms
puzzlepart.png
719 ms
1500x500.png
810 ms
atria-logo.jpg
823 ms
swi-web-image.png
824 ms
108802186
139 ms
adobe-whitespace.png
774 ms
15 ms
ui+en,table+en.css
3 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,geochart+en,table+en.I.js
34 ms
Roboto-Light-webfont.woff
729 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
739 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
813 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
player.js
105 ms
player.css
82 ms
ga.js
103 ms
vuid.min.js
102 ms
collect
14 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
700 ms
Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff
701 ms
bootloader.js
700 ms
citrix-whitespace.png
714 ms
commvault-logo---small.png
717 ms
ibm-whitespace.png
789 ms
collect
110 ms
__utm.gif
52 ms
proxy.html
42 ms
492701801.jpg
67 ms
microsoft-whitespace.png
679 ms
nuance-whitespace.png
682 ms
oracle-whitespace.png
688 ms
veeam-whitespace.png
704 ms
vmware-whitespace.png
708 ms
264 ms
all.js
253 ms
crayon.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
crayon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
crayon.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crayon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Crayon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
crayon.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Crayon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: