Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

creativeconservation.com

Virginia's Premier Provider of Foam Insulation, Sprayed Systems & Waterproofing - Creative Conservation

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

255 ms

creativeconservation.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to creativeconservation.com homepage info - get ready to check Creative Conservation best content right away, or after learning these important things about creativeconservation.com

Creative Conservation is the industry leader for residential and commercial foam insulation and sprayed systems in the Charlottesville, Richmond, Roanoke and central Virginia areas.

Visit creativeconservation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Creativeconservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

creativeconservation.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,370 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.17

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

creativeconservation.com

185 ms

www.creativeconservation.com

128 ms

www.creativeconservation.com

165 ms

style.min.css

53 ms

css2

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Creativeconservation.com, 18% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (646 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 384.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

792.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Creativeconservation.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 545.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 57.8 kB
  • After minification 49.0 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 143.2 kB
  • After minification 143.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Creative Conservation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 545.0 kB
  • After minification 545.0 kB
  • After compression 540.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 331.9 kB

  • Original 430.3 kB
  • After minification 429.6 kB
  • After compression 98.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Creativeconservation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 331.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (41%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Creative Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

creativeconservation.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

creativeconservation.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

creativeconservation.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Creativeconservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Creativeconservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Creative Conservation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: