Tools & Wizards About Us
creditbenchmark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

creditbenchmark.com

Consensus Credit Ratings and Data Analytics - Credit Benchmark

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

creditbenchmark.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to creditbenchmark.com homepage info - get ready to check Credit Benchmark best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about creditbenchmark.com

Unlock valuable insights and empower your financial institution with our credit risk consensus data, covering over 80,000 global corporates, sovereigns, and funds, including unrated entities. Navigate...

Visit creditbenchmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Creditbenchmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

creditbenchmark.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,790 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

creditbenchmark.com

47 ms

creditbenchmark.com

33 ms

www.creditbenchmark.com

485 ms

dgf_cbm_sty.css

437 ms

styles.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Creditbenchmark.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) belongs to the original domain Creditbenchmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

520.8 kB

After Optimization

413.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Creditbenchmark.com main page is 520.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 339.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 105.7 kB

  • Original 127.6 kB
  • After minification 127.6 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 339.9 kB
  • After minification 339.8 kB
  • After compression 338.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 295 B

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 53.3 kB
  • After compression 53.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Creditbenchmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Credit Benchmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

creditbenchmark.com

creditbenchmark.com

47 ms

creditbenchmark.com

creditbenchmark.com

33 ms

www.creditbenchmark.com

www.creditbenchmark.com

485 ms

dgf_cbm_sty.css

dgf_cbm_sty.css

437 ms

styles.css

styles.css

46 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

66 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

40 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

62 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

66 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

68 ms

global.css

global.css

96 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

101 ms

post-99.css

post-99.css

86 ms

post-101.css

post-101.css

101 ms

post-5294.css

post-5294.css

108 ms

css

css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

118 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

116 ms

dgf_functions.js

dgf_functions.js

125 ms

dgf_header.js

dgf_header.js

124 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

125 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

50 ms

dgf_wp7_popup.js

dgf_wp7_popup.js

45 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

51 ms

post-5326.css

post-5326.css

48 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

53 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

64 ms

dgf_footer.js

dgf_footer.js

514 ms

dgf_consents.js

dgf_consents.js

517 ms

index.js

index.js

70 ms

index.js

index.js

68 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

84 ms

api.js

api.js

34 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

87 ms

index.js

index.js

98 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

104 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

99 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

122 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

123 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

126 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

140 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

160 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

145 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

163 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

162 ms

cropped-cropped-Logo-1-1-300x41.webp

cropped-cropped-Logo-1-1-300x41.webp

115 ms

GettyImages-1162430985.webp

GettyImages-1162430985.webp

113 ms

iStock-1036740478-e1685537577317-1.webp

iStock-1036740478-e1685537577317-1.webp

113 ms

download.webp

download.webp

112 ms

sector-risk-reports.webp

sector-risk-reports.webp

113 ms

image-3.webp

image-3.webp

115 ms

image-1.webp

image-1.webp

114 ms

image-2.webp

image-2.webp

115 ms

image-7.webp

image-7.webp

115 ms

image-5.webp

image-5.webp

117 ms

image-6.webp

image-6.webp

117 ms

image-4.webp

image-4.webp

116 ms

image-8.webp

image-8.webp

116 ms

image-10.webp

image-10.webp

117 ms

image-9.webp

image-9.webp

118 ms

1234-750x375-1.webp

1234-750x375-1.webp

118 ms

FCM-2024-750x375-1.webp

FCM-2024-750x375-1.webp

118 ms

Industry-Monitor-2024-750x375-1.webp

Industry-Monitor-2024-750x375-1.webp

119 ms

jqmrb6w7-750x375-1.webp

jqmrb6w7-750x375-1.webp

119 ms

iStock-614861112-750x375-1.webp

iStock-614861112-750x375-1.webp

119 ms

logo-cb-whte-300x41.webp

logo-cb-whte-300x41.webp

118 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

78 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

93 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

104 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

103 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

103 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

103 ms

BlenderPro-Bold-1.woff

BlenderPro-Bold-1.woff

51 ms

BlenderPro-Heavy-1.woff

BlenderPro-Heavy-1.woff

51 ms

BlenderPro-Medium-1.woff

BlenderPro-Medium-1.woff

51 ms

BlenderPro-Book.woff

BlenderPro-Book.woff

51 ms

BlenderPro-Thin-1.woff

BlenderPro-Thin-1.woff

51 ms

logo-cb-whte-300x41.webp

logo-cb-whte-300x41.webp

43 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

80 ms

Accessibility Review

creditbenchmark.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

creditbenchmark.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

creditbenchmark.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Creditbenchmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Creditbenchmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

creditbenchmark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Credit Benchmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: