1.4 sec in total
18 ms
1 sec
333 ms
Welcome to crisp.chat homepage info - get ready to check Crisp best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about crisp.chat
Discover our Business Messaging Platform for Startups & SMBs. The one-stop for sales, marketing & support in one platform: Crisp. 14-day free trial. No credit card required. Try now! We provide Knowle...
Visit crisp.chatWe analyzed Crisp.chat page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
crisp.chat performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.1 s
41/100
10%
18 ms
289 ms
17 ms
62 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Crisp.chat, 4% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 1% (1 request) were made to Plausible.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) belongs to the original domain Crisp.chat.
Page size can be reduced by 91.2 kB (5%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Crisp.chat main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crisp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crisp.chat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (19%)
68
55
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crisp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
crisp.chat
18 ms
crisp.chat
289 ms
17 ms
l.js
62 ms
libs.min.css
15 ms
common.min.css
27 ms
home.min.css
22 ms
libs.min.js
34 ms
common.min.js
36 ms
lottie.min.js
35 ms
wow.min.js
33 ms
home.min.js
46 ms
script.tagged-events.js
60 ms
hotjar-140076.js
162 ms
gtm.js
134 ms
marketing-analytics-browser-0.3.2-min.js.gz
90 ms
436 ms
illustration_sun.png
76 ms
illustration_tent_blue_leaf.png
78 ms
illustration_grey_tree.png
76 ms
illustration_tent_base.png
77 ms
illustration_tent_overlay.svg
76 ms
illustration_man_overlay.png
76 ms
illustration_women_overlay.png
101 ms
illustration_table_overlay.png
90 ms
illustration_shape.png
94 ms
illustration_background_shape.png
92 ms
arrow.svg
93 ms
screenshot_messaging.png
100 ms
screenshot_crm.png
109 ms
screenshot_cobrowsing.png
377 ms
screenshot_campaigns.png
110 ms
screenshot_chatbot.png
107 ms
screenshot_livechat.png
110 ms
screenshot_helpdesk.png
115 ms
illustration_ground.png
120 ms
illustration_tree_1.png
138 ms
illustration_tree_2.png
139 ms
illustration_tree_3.png
138 ms
illustration_bench.png
139 ms
illustration_man.svg
140 ms
illustration_man_overlay.png
139 ms
illustration_women.svg
142 ms
illustration_women_overlay.png
141 ms
illustration_ground.png
145 ms
illustration_tree_2.png
165 ms
illustration_tree_1.png
148 ms
illustration_tree_3.png
156 ms
illustration_tent.png
164 ms
illustration_leaf_1.svg
162 ms
illustration_man.png
163 ms
illustration_ground.png
169 ms
illustration_background_trees.png
180 ms
client.js
31 ms
client_default.css
36 ms
inter_light.woff
445 ms
inter_regular.woff
447 ms
inter_medium.woff
370 ms
inter_semibold.woff
554 ms
inter_bold.woff
372 ms
illustration_tree_round.png
318 ms
illustration_tree_round_big.png
321 ms
illustration_people_towel.png
332 ms
illustration_people_tent.svg
347 ms
illustration_leaf_1.png
367 ms
illustration_fire.png
369 ms
illustration_people_guitar.png
363 ms
illustration_tent.png
364 ms
mailjet.png
371 ms
rakuten.svg
388 ms
airfrance.svg
377 ms
schneider_electric.svg
378 ms
xsplit.png
386 ms
renault.svg
368 ms
circle.png
376 ms
leaf.png
382 ms
crisp.chat accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
crisp.chat best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
crisp.chat SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crisp.chat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Crisp.chat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
crisp.chat
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crisp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: