Tools & Wizards About Us
crisp.chat screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

crisp.chat

The Business Messaging Platform For Every Company - Crisp

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

333 ms

crisp.chat screenshot

About Website

Welcome to crisp.chat homepage info - get ready to check Crisp best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about crisp.chat

Discover our Business Messaging Platform. The one-stop for sales, marketing & support in one platform: Crisp. 14-day free trial. Try today! We provide Knowledge base, Omnichannel Team Inbox, Chatbot, ...

Visit crisp.chat

Key Findings

We analyzed Crisp.chat page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crisp.chat performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crisp.chat

18 ms

crisp.chat

289 ms

17 ms

l.js

62 ms

libs.min.css

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Crisp.chat, 4% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 1% (1 request) were made to Plausible.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) belongs to the original domain Crisp.chat.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Crisp.chat main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 45.9 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crisp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 233.9 kB
  • After minification 233.9 kB
  • After compression 199.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 112.6 kB
  • After minification 112.6 kB
  • After compression 93.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crisp.chat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (19%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

55

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crisp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

crisp.chat

crisp.chat

18 ms

crisp.chat

crisp.chat

289 ms

17 ms

l.js

l.js

62 ms

libs.min.css

libs.min.css

15 ms

common.min.css

common.min.css

27 ms

home.min.css

home.min.css

22 ms

libs.min.js

libs.min.js

34 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

36 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

35 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

33 ms

home.min.js

home.min.js

46 ms

script.tagged-events.js

script.tagged-events.js

60 ms

hotjar-140076.js

hotjar-140076.js

162 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

134 ms

marketing-analytics-browser-0.3.2-min.js.gz

marketing-analytics-browser-0.3.2-min.js.gz

90 ms

436 ms

illustration_sun.png

illustration_sun.png

76 ms

illustration_tent_blue_leaf.png

illustration_tent_blue_leaf.png

78 ms

illustration_grey_tree.png

illustration_grey_tree.png

76 ms

illustration_tent_base.png

illustration_tent_base.png

77 ms

illustration_tent_overlay.svg

illustration_tent_overlay.svg

76 ms

illustration_man_overlay.png

illustration_man_overlay.png

76 ms

illustration_women_overlay.png

illustration_women_overlay.png

101 ms

illustration_table_overlay.png

illustration_table_overlay.png

90 ms

illustration_shape.png

illustration_shape.png

94 ms

illustration_background_shape.png

illustration_background_shape.png

92 ms

arrow.svg

arrow.svg

93 ms

screenshot_messaging.png

screenshot_messaging.png

100 ms

screenshot_crm.png

screenshot_crm.png

109 ms

screenshot_cobrowsing.png

screenshot_cobrowsing.png

377 ms

screenshot_campaigns.png

screenshot_campaigns.png

110 ms

screenshot_chatbot.png

screenshot_chatbot.png

107 ms

screenshot_livechat.png

screenshot_livechat.png

110 ms

screenshot_helpdesk.png

screenshot_helpdesk.png

115 ms

illustration_ground.png

illustration_ground.png

120 ms

illustration_tree_1.png

illustration_tree_1.png

138 ms

illustration_tree_2.png

illustration_tree_2.png

139 ms

illustration_tree_3.png

illustration_tree_3.png

138 ms

illustration_bench.png

illustration_bench.png

139 ms

illustration_man.svg

illustration_man.svg

140 ms

illustration_man_overlay.png

illustration_man_overlay.png

139 ms

illustration_women.svg

illustration_women.svg

142 ms

illustration_women_overlay.png

illustration_women_overlay.png

141 ms

illustration_ground.png

illustration_ground.png

145 ms

illustration_tree_2.png

illustration_tree_2.png

165 ms

illustration_tree_1.png

illustration_tree_1.png

148 ms

illustration_tree_3.png

illustration_tree_3.png

156 ms

illustration_tent.png

illustration_tent.png

164 ms

illustration_leaf_1.svg

illustration_leaf_1.svg

162 ms

illustration_man.png

illustration_man.png

163 ms

illustration_ground.png

illustration_ground.png

169 ms

illustration_background_trees.png

illustration_background_trees.png

180 ms

client.js

client.js

31 ms

client_default.css

client_default.css

36 ms

inter_light.woff

inter_light.woff

445 ms

inter_regular.woff

inter_regular.woff

447 ms

inter_medium.woff

inter_medium.woff

370 ms

inter_semibold.woff

inter_semibold.woff

554 ms

inter_bold.woff

inter_bold.woff

372 ms

illustration_tree_round.png

illustration_tree_round.png

318 ms

illustration_tree_round_big.png

illustration_tree_round_big.png

321 ms

illustration_people_towel.png

illustration_people_towel.png

332 ms

illustration_people_tent.svg

illustration_people_tent.svg

347 ms

illustration_leaf_1.png

illustration_leaf_1.png

367 ms

illustration_fire.png

illustration_fire.png

369 ms

illustration_people_guitar.png

illustration_people_guitar.png

363 ms

illustration_tent.png

illustration_tent.png

364 ms

mailjet.png

mailjet.png

371 ms

rakuten.svg

rakuten.svg

388 ms

airfrance.svg

airfrance.svg

377 ms

schneider_electric.svg

schneider_electric.svg

378 ms

xsplit.png

xsplit.png

386 ms

renault.svg

renault.svg

368 ms

circle.png

circle.png

376 ms

leaf.png

leaf.png

382 ms

Accessibility Review

crisp.chat accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

crisp.chat best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

crisp.chat SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crisp.chat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Crisp.chat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

crisp.chat

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crisp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: