Tools & Wizards About Us
crispnames.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

crispnames.com

Domain Registration & Hosting – Search for your Domain Name at BigRock

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

218 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

83 ms

crispnames.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to crispnames.com homepage info - get ready to check Crisp Name S best content right away, or after learning these important things about crispnames.com

Search and register domain names at the world's leading domain Registration & web hosting company. Now get 2 FREE Email Accounts with every domain name. Begin your domain search now.

Visit crispnames.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Crispnames.com page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crispnames.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.345

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crispnames.com

218 ms

bigrock.com

30 ms

www.bigrock.com

749 ms

js

77 ms

gtm.js

139 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Crispnames.com, 75% (40 requests) were made to Bigrock.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (749 ms) relates to the external source Bigrock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

219.3 kB

After Optimization

146.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Crispnames.com main page is 219.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 80.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 80.2 kB
  • After minification 80.1 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 518 B

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crisp Name S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 78.8 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 68.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (73%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crisp Name S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

crispnames.com

crispnames.com

218 ms

bigrock.com

bigrock.com

30 ms

www.bigrock.com

www.bigrock.com

749 ms

js

js

77 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

139 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

41 ms

fat-menu.css

fat-menu.css

59 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

86 ms

refer_a_friend.css

refer_a_friend.css

104 ms

style.css

style.css

111 ms

zstyle.css

zstyle.css

88 ms

homepage.css

homepage.css

67 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

109 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

130 ms

jquery.cookie-1.3.1.js

jquery.cookie-1.3.1.js

104 ms

commonScripts.js

commonScripts.js

134 ms

cart.js

cart.js

137 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

140 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

44 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

139 ms

full-width.css

full-width.css

138 ms

innerfade.js

innerfade.js

137 ms

wz_tooltip.js

wz_tooltip.js

166 ms

footerScripts.js

footerScripts.js

167 ms

ga_event_tracking.js

ga_event_tracking.js

169 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

53 ms

csrfprotector.js

csrfprotector.js

169 ms

phx_br_logo.svg

phx_br_logo.svg

103 ms

phx_footer_logo.svg

phx_footer_logo.svg

105 ms

newhpfacebook.png

newhpfacebook.png

51 ms

newhptwitter.png

newhptwitter.png

51 ms

newhpyoutube.png

newhpyoutube.png

105 ms

newhpwordpress.png

newhpwordpress.png

103 ms

newhpgoogle.png

newhpgoogle.png

102 ms

newhpmedium.png

newhpmedium.png

103 ms

newhpyoutubevideo.png

newhpyoutubevideo.png

104 ms

facebook-icon.svg

facebook-icon.svg

104 ms

twitter-icon.svg

twitter-icon.svg

129 ms

google-icon.svg

google-icon.svg

127 ms

youtube-icon.svg

youtube-icon.svg

141 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

20 ms

all.js

all.js

92 ms

feature-h3-bg.gif

feature-h3-bg.gif

97 ms

username-icon.png

username-icon.png

93 ms

password-icon.png

password-icon.png

107 ms

load.gif

load.gif

116 ms

79 ms

gtmDataLayer.js

gtmDataLayer.js

301 ms

content.php

content.php

260 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

303 ms

all.js

all.js

6 ms

53 ms

33 ms

Accessibility Review

crispnames.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

crispnames.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

crispnames.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crispnames.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Crispnames.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

crispnames.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Crisp Name S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: