Tools & Wizards About Us
criteriaforsuccess.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

criteriaforsuccess.com

Robot Challenge Screen

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

522 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

545 ms

criteriaforsuccess.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Criteriaforsuccess content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about criteriaforsuccess.com

Here at CFS, we offer training and consulting programs that focus on aligning proprietary tools and methods to fit your companies needs.

Visit criteriaforsuccess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Criteriaforsuccess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 522 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

criteriaforsuccess.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

criteriaforsuccess.com

522 ms

style.min.css

67 ms

live.css

194 ms

jquery.min.js

369 ms

css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Criteriaforsuccess.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (522 ms) belongs to the original domain Criteriaforsuccess.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.9 kB (53%)

Content Size

121.3 kB

After Optimization

56.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Criteriaforsuccess.com main page is 121.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 66.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 57.2 kB

  • Original 66.9 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 12.1 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Criteriaforsuccess needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 42.2 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (57%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Criteriaforsuccess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

criteriaforsuccess.com

criteriaforsuccess.com

522 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

67 ms

live.css

live.css

194 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

369 ms

css

css

39 ms

423780.js

423780.js

70 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

364 ms

live.js

live.js

366 ms

lazy_init.js

lazy_init.js

364 ms

home.js

home.js

364 ms

jquery.paroller.min.js

jquery.paroller.min.js

366 ms

testimonials.js

testimonials.js

367 ms

v2.js

v2.js

98 ms

logo_white.png

logo_white.png

118 ms

logo_black.png

logo_black.png

117 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

196 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

380 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

321 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

137 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

57 ms

intersection-observer.js

intersection-observer.js

68 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

60 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

70 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

111 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

124 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

124 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

125 ms

423780.js

423780.js

119 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

120 ms

423780.js

423780.js

118 ms

Stocksy_txp390256dcsnZ200_Medium_1404017.jpg

Stocksy_txp390256dcsnZ200_Medium_1404017.jpg

144 ms

our-expertise-bg.jpg

our-expertise-bg.jpg

319 ms

transform-parallax.png

transform-parallax.png

133 ms

books-441866_1920-1140x855.jpg

books-441866_1920-1140x855.jpg

134 ms

walknyc-1140x805.jpg

walknyc-1140x805.jpg

258 ms

salesforce.png

salesforce.png

143 ms

wells-fargo.png

wells-fargo.png

143 ms

webmd.png

webmd.png

206 ms

appen.png

appen.png

206 ms

twc.png

twc.png

207 ms

havas-media.png

havas-media.png

255 ms

tmb.png

tmb.png

258 ms

bt.png

bt.png

258 ms

readers-digest.png

readers-digest.png

262 ms

time.png

time.png

322 ms

Untitled-design.png

Untitled-design.png

323 ms

success.png

success.png

320 ms

mountain-lake.jpg

mountain-lake.jpg

446 ms

Accessibility Review

criteriaforsuccess.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

criteriaforsuccess.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

criteriaforsuccess.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criteriaforsuccess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Criteriaforsuccess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

criteriaforsuccess.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Criteriaforsuccess. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: