Tools & Wizards About Us
criterion.ec screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

criterion.ec

Criterion Digital • Media Publisher & SEO Agency

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

868 ms

Page Rendered

428 ms

criterion.ec screenshot

About Website

Visit criterion.ec now to see the best up-to-date Criterion content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about criterion.ec

Criterion Digital is a publishing company with a portfolio of web properties that attract large audiences worldwide.

Visit criterion.ec

Key Findings

We analyzed Criterion.ec page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

criterion.ec performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

criterion.ec

101 ms

home.ffc0a6.min.js

81 ms

logo-light.svg

204 ms

bg-hero-60a86a.jpg

212 ms

logo-dark.svg

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Criterion.ec, 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (236 ms) belongs to the original domain Criterion.ec.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

394.4 kB

After Optimization

327.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Criterion.ec main page is 394.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 234.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 67.4 kB

  • Original 81.8 kB
  • After minification 81.8 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13 B

  • Original 234.1 kB
  • After minification 234.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Criterion images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 70.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Criterion.ec has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Criterion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

criterion.ec

criterion.ec

101 ms

home.ffc0a6.min.js

home.ffc0a6.min.js

81 ms

logo-light.svg

logo-light.svg

204 ms

bg-hero-60a86a.jpg

bg-hero-60a86a.jpg

212 ms

logo-dark.svg

logo-dark.svg

205 ms

css

css

96 ms

all.css

all.css

187 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

186 ms

js

js

133 ms

bg-650.jpg

bg-650.jpg

164 ms

gam.svg

gam.svg

97 ms

aps.svg

aps.svg

100 ms

kubernetes.svg

kubernetes.svg

102 ms

microsoft-azure.svg

microsoft-azure.svg

107 ms

AspNetCore.svg

AspNetCore.svg

105 ms

aws.svg

aws.svg

163 ms

cloudflare.svg

cloudflare.svg

235 ms

google-cloud.svg

google-cloud.svg

233 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

236 ms

js

js

81 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

39 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

39 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

67 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

67 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

68 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

129 ms

et-line.woff

et-line.woff

58 ms

collect

collect

93 ms

Accessibility Review

criterion.ec accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

criterion.ec best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

criterion.ec SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criterion.ec can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Criterion.ec main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

criterion.ec

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Criterion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: