Tools & Wizards About Us
criterium-ackerman.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 63

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

criterium-ackerman.com

Criterium-Ackerma Engineers: Building Inspection Engineers Since 1970

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

861 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

criterium-ackerman.com screenshot

About Website

Visit criterium-ackerman.com now to see the best up-to-date Criterium Ackerma N content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about criterium-ackerman.com

Criterium-Ackerman Engineers has been assisting owners, buyers, homeowner associations, investors and developers in Northeast Ohio since 1970

Visit criterium-ackerman.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Criterium-ackerman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 861 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

criterium-ackerman.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.454

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

criterium-ackerman.com

861 ms

style.min.css

127 ms

style.min.css

104 ms

slick.css

101 ms

slick-theme.css

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Criterium-ackerman.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Criterium-ackerman.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 740.5 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Criterium-ackerman.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 262.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Criterium Ackerma N needs image optimization as it can save up to 262.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 182.5 kB

  • Original 261.1 kB
  • After minification 252.7 kB
  • After compression 78.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 262.5 kB

  • Original 310.0 kB
  • After minification 306.3 kB
  • After compression 47.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Criterium-ackerman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 262.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (63%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Criterium Ackerma N. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

criterium-ackerman.com

criterium-ackerman.com

861 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

127 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

104 ms

slick.css

slick.css

101 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

101 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

161 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

168 ms

jquery.mmenu.positioning.css

jquery.mmenu.positioning.css

133 ms

jquery.mmenu.setselected.css

jquery.mmenu.setselected.css

131 ms

jquery.mhead.css

jquery.mhead.css

131 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

136 ms

css

css

37 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

195 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

231 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

172 ms

js

js

61 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

171 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

212 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

212 ms

equalize.min.js

equalize.min.js

212 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

213 ms

inview.min.js

inview.min.js

225 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.js

jquery.mmenu.all.js

286 ms

jquery.mmenu.setselected.js

jquery.mmenu.setselected.js

284 ms

jquery.mhead.js

jquery.mhead.js

285 ms

body_BGs.jpg

body_BGs.jpg

75 ms

logo@2x.png

logo@2x.png

46 ms

vision21.jpg

vision21.jpg

181 ms

Mission21.jpg

Mission21.jpg

181 ms

slide2-80-1024x341-triangles.png

slide2-80-1024x341-triangles.png

261 ms

slide4-80.jpg

slide4-80.jpg

174 ms

commercial-80.jpg

commercial-80.jpg

98 ms

residential-80.jpg

residential-80.jpg

125 ms

homeowner-80.jpg

homeowner-80.jpg

144 ms

construction-80.jpg

construction-80.jpg

190 ms

footer_logo@2x-300x116.png

footer_logo@2x-300x116.png

181 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

58 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

66 ms

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95AiFW_g.ttf

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95AiFW_g.ttf

73 ms

BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbCGwRg.ttf

BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbCGwRg.ttf

70 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

190 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

217 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

198 ms

bodyBGs.jpg

bodyBGs.jpg

1857 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1860 ms

Accessibility Review

criterium-ackerman.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

criterium-ackerman.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

criterium-ackerman.com SEO score

63

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criterium-ackerman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Criterium-ackerman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

criterium-ackerman.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Criterium Ackerma N. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: