Tools & Wizards About Us
criterium-bennett.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

criterium-bennett.com

Criterium-Bennett Engineers: Building Inspection Engineers Since 2016

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

595 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

192 ms

criterium-bennett.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to criterium-bennett.com homepage info - get ready to check Criterium Bennett best content right away, or after learning these important things about criterium-bennett.com

Criterium-Bennett Engineers, consulting engineering services for residential, commercial, construction QA, and HOAs in NH.

Visit criterium-bennett.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Criterium-bennett.com page load time and found that the first response time was 595 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

criterium-bennett.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.843

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

criterium-bennett.com

595 ms

style.min.css

113 ms

sassy-social-share-public.css

98 ms

style.min.css

131 ms

slick.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Criterium-bennett.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Criterium-bennett.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 873.0 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Criterium-bennett.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 52.7 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 318.6 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Criterium Bennett needs image optimization as it can save up to 318.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 262.4 kB

  • Original 380.9 kB
  • After minification 372.5 kB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 248.8 kB

  • Original 295.2 kB
  • After minification 291.6 kB
  • After compression 46.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Criterium-bennett.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 248.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Criterium Bennett. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

criterium-bennett.com

criterium-bennett.com

595 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

113 ms

sassy-social-share-public.css

sassy-social-share-public.css

98 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

131 ms

slick.css

slick.css

96 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

99 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

164 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

193 ms

jquery.mmenu.positioning.css

jquery.mmenu.positioning.css

129 ms

jquery.mmenu.setselected.css

jquery.mmenu.setselected.css

133 ms

jquery.mhead.css

jquery.mhead.css

144 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

165 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

200 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

166 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

176 ms

js

js

66 ms

sassy-social-share-public.js

sassy-social-share-public.js

294 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

199 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

293 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

292 ms

equalize.min.js

equalize.min.js

292 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

292 ms

inview.min.js

inview.min.js

292 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.js

jquery.mmenu.all.js

297 ms

jquery.mmenu.setselected.js

jquery.mmenu.setselected.js

293 ms

jquery.mhead.js

jquery.mhead.js

296 ms

body_BGs.jpg

body_BGs.jpg

54 ms

logo@2x.png

logo@2x.png

54 ms

vision21.jpg

vision21.jpg

190 ms

Mission21.jpg

Mission21.jpg

138 ms

slide2-80-1024x341-triangles.png

slide2-80-1024x341-triangles.png

277 ms

slide4-80.jpg

slide4-80.jpg

137 ms

commercial-80.jpg

commercial-80.jpg

160 ms

homeowner-80.jpg

homeowner-80.jpg

136 ms

residential-80.jpg

residential-80.jpg

176 ms

Speciality-Button.jpg

Speciality-Button.jpg

174 ms

footer_logo@2x.png

footer_logo@2x.png

170 ms

socmed@2x.png

socmed@2x.png

200 ms

font

font

83 ms

font

font

161 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

178 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

198 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

191 ms

bodyBGs.jpg

bodyBGs.jpg

1025 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1034 ms

Accessibility Review

criterium-bennett.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

criterium-bennett.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

criterium-bennett.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criterium-bennett.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Criterium-bennett.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

criterium-bennett.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Criterium Bennett. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: