6.6 sec in total
2 sec
3.8 sec
744 ms
Welcome to critfc.org homepage info - get ready to check CRITFC best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about critfc.org
Visit critfc.orgWe analyzed Critfc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
critfc.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.494
17/100
15%
Value8.3 s
39/100
10%
2009 ms
63 ms
117 ms
118 ms
11 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Critfc.org, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Critfc.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (53%)
2.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Critfc.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 809.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CRITFC images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 368.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 368.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 660.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Critfc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 660.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (56%)
57
25
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CRITFC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.critfc.org
2009 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
63 ms
fancybox.css
117 ms
sb-instagram.css
118 ms
font-awesome.min.css
11 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
121 ms
pagenavi-css.css
120 ms
style.css
134 ms
css
113 ms
style.css
160 ms
shortcodes.css
128 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
127 ms
magnific_popup.css
164 ms
shiftnav.min.css
167 ms
standard-dark.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
168 ms
jquery.js
178 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
162 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
196 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
94 ms
close.png
75 ms
loading.gif
61 ms
prev.png
57 ms
next.png
58 ms
icon-fish.png
52 ms
home-icon.png
50 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
27 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
27 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
26 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
28 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
26 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
26 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
54 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
53 ms
header-back1.jpg
48 ms
CRITFC-logo.png
48 ms
raleway-semibold-webfont.woff
42 ms
critfc-glyphs.woff
49 ms
CRITFC-kids-logo.png
40 ms
fish-back.gif
40 ms
who-we-are.jpg
44 ms
member-tribes.jpg
45 ms
salmon-culture.jpg
44 ms
our-impact.jpg
38 ms
dam.jpg
41 ms
chinook-salmon-front-page.jpg
41 ms
HagermanLab-front-page.jpg
35 ms
celilo-fall-front-page.jpg
39 ms
salmon-camp-front-page.jpg
36 ms
decor-border-top.png
58 ms
fish-back.jpg
169 ms
decor-border-bottom.png
61 ms
footer-back.gif
56 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.woff
59 ms
aphrodite_pro-webfont.woff
164 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.woff
163 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
49 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
18 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf
20 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
20 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf
19 ms
printfriendly.js
59 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
34 ms
idle-timer.min.js
61 ms
custom.js
71 ms
critfc.js
32 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
27 ms
custom.js
75 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
60 ms
waypoints.min.js
61 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
114 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
120 ms
shiftnav.min.js
118 ms
wp-embed.min.js
118 ms
salvattore.min.js
117 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
68 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3 ms
critfc.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
critfc.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
critfc.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Critfc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Critfc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
critfc.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CRITFC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: