Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

criticmarkup.com

GitHub - CriticMarkup/CriticMarkup-toolkit: Various tools to use CriticMarkup in your daily workflow

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

criticmarkup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Critic Markup content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about criticmarkup.com

Various tools to use CriticMarkup in your daily workflow - GitHub - CriticMarkup/CriticMarkup-toolkit: Various tools to use CriticMarkup in your daily workflow

Visit criticmarkup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Criticmarkup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

criticmarkup.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

criticmarkup.com

82 ms

CriticMarkup-toolkit

432 ms

light-5178aee0ee76.css

117 ms

dark-217d4f9c8e70.css

119 ms

primer-a8d2a8e3b2d5.css

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Criticmarkup.com, 78% (45 requests) were made to Github.githubassets.com and 17% (10 requests) were made to Avatars.githubusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (563 ms) relates to the external source Camo.githubusercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 214.8 kB (56%)

Content Size

384.4 kB

After Optimization

169.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Criticmarkup.com main page is 384.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 244.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 206.1 kB

  • Original 244.5 kB
  • After minification 233.5 kB
  • After compression 38.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 19.5 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Critic Markup needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 120.4 kB
  • After minification 116.1 kB
  • After compression 115.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Criticmarkup.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (78%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Critic Markup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

criticmarkup.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

criticmarkup.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

criticmarkup.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criticmarkup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Criticmarkup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Critic Markup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: