Tools & Wizards About Us
cropmark.lu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

cropmark.lu

cropmark. creative studio

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

308 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

71 ms

cropmark.lu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cropmark.lu homepage info - get ready to check Cropmark best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about cropmark.lu

cropmark is a full-service creative studio based in Luxembourg and Brussels.

Visit cropmark.lu

Key Findings

We analyzed Cropmark.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cropmark.lu performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.585

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cropmark.lu

308 ms

cropmark.lu

390 ms

www.cropmark.com

1015 ms

styles.css

189 ms

www.cropmark.com

551 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cropmark.lu, 64% (36 requests) were made to Cropmark.imgix.net and 18% (10 requests) were made to Cropmark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Cropmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

719.8 kB

After Optimization

601.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cropmark.lu main page is 719.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 405.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 115.2 kB

  • Original 134.9 kB
  • After minification 134.7 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 405.3 kB
  • After minification 402.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cropmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 212 B

  • Original 163.4 kB
  • After minification 163.4 kB
  • After compression 163.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cropmark.lu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (10%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cropmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cropmark.lu

cropmark.lu

308 ms

cropmark.lu

cropmark.lu

390 ms

www.cropmark.com

www.cropmark.com

1015 ms

styles.css

styles.css

189 ms

www.cropmark.com

www.cropmark.com

551 ms

label-co2-website-white-en.png

label-co2-website-white-en.png

302 ms

vendors.js

vendors.js

383 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

224 ms

track.js

track.js

307 ms

nicolas_color_def3.jpg

nicolas_color_def3.jpg

112 ms

awwwards_honorable.png

awwwards_honorable.png

158 ms

logo--cropmark.svg

logo--cropmark.svg

197 ms

icon--arrow.svg

icon--arrow.svg

248 ms

nicolas_def3.jpg

nicolas_def3.jpg

103 ms

elodie_2.jpg

elodie_2.jpg

105 ms

team__elodie-hover.jpg

team__elodie-hover.jpg

105 ms

thibault2.jpg

thibault2.jpg

105 ms

team__thibault-hover.jpg

team__thibault-hover.jpg

104 ms

grethel2.jpg

grethel2.jpg

106 ms

team__grethel-hover.jpg

team__grethel-hover.jpg

106 ms

Angelo2.jpg

Angelo2.jpg

108 ms

Angelo1.jpg

Angelo1.jpg

107 ms

Romain2.jpg

Romain2.jpg

108 ms

team__romain-hover.jpg

team__romain-hover.jpg

107 ms

jeff_2.jpg

jeff_2.jpg

109 ms

team__jeff-hover.jpg

team__jeff-hover.jpg

109 ms

jacques4.jpg

jacques4.jpg

112 ms

team__jacques-hover.jpg

team__jacques-hover.jpg

110 ms

Joy_cropmark_4.jpg

Joy_cropmark_4.jpg

110 ms

Joy_cropmark_2.jpg

Joy_cropmark_2.jpg

109 ms

Romain_cropmark_4.jpg

Romain_cropmark_4.jpg

111 ms

Romain_cropmark_5.jpg

Romain_cropmark_5.jpg

111 ms

HankenSans-Regular.woff2

HankenSans-Regular.woff2

360 ms

Elektron_TN_image_1.jpg

Elektron_TN_image_1.jpg

35 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

32 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

515 ms

611b77094df55

611b77094df55

326 ms

EDF_TN_image_1.jpg

EDF_TN_image_1.jpg

31 ms

LMIH_TN_image_1.jpg

LMIH_TN_image_1.jpg

301 ms

WAISS_KAUL_TN_image_2.jpg

WAISS_KAUL_TN_image_2.jpg

32 ms

WAA_TN_image_1.jpg

WAA_TN_image_1.jpg

380 ms

WEIDMANNS_TN_image_1.jpg

WEIDMANNS_TN_image_1.jpg

33 ms

BM_TN_image_1.jpg

BM_TN_image_1.jpg

53 ms

ARTIKUSS_TN_image_12.jpg

ARTIKUSS_TN_image_12.jpg

59 ms

Rotondes_TN_image_1_220626_212837.jpg

Rotondes_TN_image_1_220626_212837.jpg

59 ms

46769777_358956184668817_1679584763565071329_n.jpg

46769777_358956184668817_1679584763565071329_n.jpg

60 ms

45287880_324005234854810_6784580574983743672_n.jpg

45287880_324005234854810_6784580574983743672_n.jpg

243 ms

44891363_175825903377568_4364246913987869077_n.jpg

44891363_175825903377568_4364246913987869077_n.jpg

82 ms

46717236_285505725642829_9073240772956404871_n.jpg

46717236_285505725642829_9073240772956404871_n.jpg

76 ms

45510146_392403564634078_328036543869745558_n.jpg

45510146_392403564634078_328036543869745558_n.jpg

224 ms

60960190_201377627499844_7038043643450142228_n.jpg

60960190_201377627499844_7038043643450142228_n.jpg

523 ms

62380111_1539350049534640_4640020865152859270_n.jpg

62380111_1539350049534640_4640020865152859270_n.jpg

109 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

HankenSans-Regular.woff

HankenSans-Regular.woff

242 ms

js

js

57 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

417 ms

Accessibility Review

cropmark.lu accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cropmark.lu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cropmark.lu SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cropmark.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cropmark.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cropmark.lu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cropmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: