Tools & Wizards About Us
crsfbay.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

crsfbay.com

CCSS - Computer & IT Company - East Bay Area: Concord Walnut Creek Pleasant HillCantrell’s Computer Sales and Service

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

crsfbay.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Crsf Bay content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about crsfbay.com

(925) 827-1200 - We buy, sell, upgrade, repair, service, and network computers & laptops. Serving Contra Costa: Concord, Martinez, Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek

Visit crsfbay.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Crsfbay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crsfbay.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.217

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crsfbay.com

164 ms

www.crsfbay.com

837 ms

960.css

71 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

140 ms

jquery.min.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Crsfbay.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Adtrack.voicestar.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) belongs to the original domain Crsfbay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 147.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

969.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Crsfbay.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 588.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 73.3 kB

  • Original 90.4 kB
  • After minification 87.6 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 363.3 kB
  • After minification 351.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crsf Bay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 588.9 kB
  • After minification 588.8 kB
  • After compression 541.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 74.1 kB
  • After minification 74.1 kB
  • After compression 59.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crsfbay.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crsf Bay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

crsfbay.com

crsfbay.com

164 ms

www.crsfbay.com

www.crsfbay.com

837 ms

960.css

960.css

71 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

140 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

25 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

266 ms

styles.css

styles.css

201 ms

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

199 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

159 ms

jquery.prettyphoto.js

jquery.prettyphoto.js

203 ms

spin.min.js

spin.min.js

200 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

278 ms

prime-plugin-base.js

prime-plugin-base.js

273 ms

prime-plugins.js

prime-plugins.js

274 ms

script.js

script.js

272 ms

js

js

56 ms

prettyphoto.css

prettyphoto.css

273 ms

style.css

style.css

402 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

333 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

338 ms

print.css

print.css

339 ms

animate.css

animate.css

344 ms

number-changer.js

number-changer.js

28 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

346 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

445 ms

index.js

index.js

446 ms

index.js

index.js

446 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

447 ms

widget.js

widget.js

216 ms

image4.png

image4.png

213 ms

WGFl7tNH_200x200.jpg

WGFl7tNH_200x200.jpg

211 ms

IntelGTP.png

IntelGTP.png

212 ms

fabric_plaid.png

fabric_plaid.png

80 ms

CCSS_277x70.png

CCSS_277x70.png

79 ms

getnumdata.js

getnumdata.js

35 ms

entypo-webfont.woff

entypo-webfont.woff

133 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

90 ms

Kyle-Servicing-Tower-980x439.jpg

Kyle-Servicing-Tower-980x439.jpg

257 ms

ram-980x439.jpg

ram-980x439.jpg

135 ms

new-980x439.jpg

new-980x439.jpg

73 ms

refurbished-towers-980x439.jpg

refurbished-towers-980x439.jpg

74 ms

widget_app_base_1725874918757.js

widget_app_base_1725874918757.js

19 ms

all.js

all.js

40 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

28 ms

in.js

in.js

40 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

41 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

63 ms

all.js

all.js

61 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

51 ms

Accessibility Review

crsfbay.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

crsfbay.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

crsfbay.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crsfbay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Crsfbay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

crsfbay.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Crsf Bay. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: