3.3 sec in total
338 ms
2.8 sec
222 ms
Click here to check amazing Cruise Compare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cruisecompare.co.uk
Search and compare the whole cruise market in seconds with Cruise Compare, the UK's No.1 cruise holiday website. Our comparison cruise engine saves you time and money.
Visit cruisecompare.co.ukWe analyzed Cruisecompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 338 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
cruisecompare.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
338 ms
447 ms
287 ms
292 ms
373 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Cruisecompare.co.uk, 17% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 14% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 562.1 kB (70%)
797.5 kB
235.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Cruisecompare.co.uk main page is 797.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 572.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cruise Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 466.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 466.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cruisecompare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (53%)
58
27
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cruise Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cruisecompare.co.uk
338 ms
Layout.css
447 ms
Nav.css
287 ms
Forms.css
292 ms
Text.css
373 ms
all.js
272 ms
WebResource.axd
366 ms
WebResource.axd
288 ms
ScriptResource.axd
568 ms
ScriptResource.axd
371 ms
ScriptResource.axd
442 ms
ScriptResource.axd
442 ms
ScriptResource.axd
451 ms
ScriptResource.axd
453 ms
ScriptResource.axd
600 ms
ScriptResource.axd
492 ms
ScriptResource.axd
494 ms
js
494 ms
ga.js
43 ms
tracking.js
100 ms
logo-cruise-compare.jpg
120 ms
telephone.jpg
235 ms
abta-header.jpg
168 ms
9531a4e0-b126-46fa-891e-5ab1dfd1fc1d.gif
303 ms
HomeNewsIcons.jpg
254 ms
Home-PO.gif
235 ms
Home-Cunard.gif
272 ms
Home-NCL.gif
276 ms
Home-RC.gif
298 ms
HomeVideoThumb2.gif
346 ms
btnSignUp.gif
342 ms
151 ms
xd_arbiter.php
239 ms
xd_arbiter.php
449 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
TopShadow.gif
149 ms
topnav-tile.gif
162 ms
TopNavSpacer.gif
184 ms
HomeSearch.gif
196 ms
BottomShadow.gif
206 ms
like_box.php
169 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
297 ms
jGc-59L_9lo.css
366 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
506 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
631 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
498 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
504 ms
12729275_1021970607851004_8274423528539237874_n.jpg
466 ms
734268_507187479329322_1352949964_n.jpg
533 ms
12308273_10153759933829712_3309667664542545060_n.jpg
602 ms
11800266_1137396182941387_7597651508239691814_n.jpg
668 ms
11390238_10152964739132029_3926717607182610387_n.jpg
670 ms
1004875_10203109769892522_6118556841550907494_n.jpg
668 ms
12189716_880055975435808_7892916408732933175_n.jpg
669 ms
483211_106845142794458_1374670250_n.jpg
733 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
73 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
72 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
74 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
68 ms
cruisecompare.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
cruisecompare.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cruisecompare.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cruisecompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cruisecompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cruisecompare.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cruise Compare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: