1.7 sec in total
105 ms
1.5 sec
83 ms
Click here to check amazing Cruisewatch content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cruisewatch.ai
Use Cruisewatch's Travel API’s to receive cruise alerts, customer review analyses and cruise market updates. Profit from our AI-based travel technology!
Visit cruisewatch.aiWe analyzed Cruisewatch.ai page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
cruisewatch.ai performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value640 ms
46/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
105 ms
29 ms
33 ms
33 ms
295 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cruisewatch.ai, 36% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (21 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 448.8 kB (47%)
957.6 kB
508.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Cruisewatch.ai main page is 957.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 481.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 383.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 383.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cruisewatch needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)
38
26
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cruisewatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cruisewatch.ai
105 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
29 ms
minified.js
33 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
33 ms
polyfill.min.js
295 ms
email-decode.min.js
17 ms
thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js
52 ms
main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js
54 ms
lodash.min.js
49 ms
react.production.min.js
50 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
52 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
50 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
51 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-08-29%2016_30_50.png
256 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202023-04-05%2017_41_52.png
435 ms
c35d12_6ad021bf2ea64fcdbf80b26750961c68~mv2.png
445 ms
c35d12_73fc72e636104706af9044550ef2f4ce~mv2.png
434 ms
c35d12_e0015b048a3042a28f8f55677c19fda9~mv2.png
461 ms
c35d12_f48972b6d492435aa7309a88ee2431d0~mv2.png
517 ms
c35d12_f5032452f2394a5e89b0875177b27525~mv2.png
438 ms
c35d12_8b1b7e4018574e29b8e3020755c6743a~mv2.png
593 ms
c35d12_e99daf906e434a8c8114a616d113702c~mv2.png
599 ms
c35d12_9f8a8f0fb6b447d98383a679e7b4a3c4~mv2.png
598 ms
c35d12_85ac82d529f14e51a941e988279f3f97~mv2.png
678 ms
c35d12_8aa67729c6f444d4a2a99e2afc02b9a3~mv2.png
678 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-08-11%2013_53_00.png
721 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-10-16%2022_31_05.png
761 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-08-11%2014_01_10.png
883 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-10-16%2022_35_21.png
725 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-08-11%2013_53_09.png
1009 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-10-17%2019_05_10.png
841 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-09-02%2017_40_11.png
1027 ms
%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%202022-08-11%2014_02_55.png
899 ms
c35d12_1a3c083f43104601876b57e945fa9f87~mv2.png
949 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
39 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
40 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
37 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
37 ms
AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff
38 ms
bundle.min.js
95 ms
140 ms
139 ms
134 ms
132 ms
128 ms
130 ms
185 ms
175 ms
178 ms
173 ms
173 ms
172 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
17 ms
bolt-performance
15 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
4 ms
right-arrow.svg
15 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
11 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
cruisewatch.ai accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
cruisewatch.ai best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cruisewatch.ai SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cruisewatch.ai can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cruisewatch.ai main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cruisewatch.ai
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cruisewatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: