3.1 sec in total
376 ms
2.2 sec
466 ms
Welcome to csbenchmarking.com homepage info - get ready to check CSB Enchmarking best content right away, or after learning these important things about csbenchmarking.com
The Customer Service Benchmarking Association is a leading organization that helps businesses improve customer service through industry-specific benchmarking
Visit csbenchmarking.comWe analyzed Csbenchmarking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
csbenchmarking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value2.5 s
97/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
376 ms
92 ms
182 ms
290 ms
396 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Csbenchmarking.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Csbenchmarking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 479.8 kB (11%)
4.2 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Csbenchmarking.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 419.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CSB Enchmarking needs image optimization as it can save up to 419.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 524 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Csbenchmarking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (70%)
27
8
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CSB Enchmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
csbenchmarking.com
376 ms
custom-color-overrides.css
92 ms
style.css
182 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
290 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
396 ms
swiper.min.css
303 ms
post-7.css
322 ms
post-478.css
327 ms
css
39 ms
fontawesome.min.css
297 ms
solid.min.css
373 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
387 ms
responsive-embeds.js
381 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
465 ms
jquery.min.js
495 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
466 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
545 ms
waypoints.min.js
476 ms
core.min.js
476 ms
frontend.min.js
490 ms
cropped-Kraft-Mobile-Veterinary-Service-5.png
615 ms
Untitled-design-48.png
911 ms
Untitled-design-49.png
885 ms
Untitled-design-52-1.png
1015 ms
Untitled-design-51-1.png
1096 ms
Untitled-design-50.png
1038 ms
polyfills.js
242 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
491 ms
print.css
90 ms
csbenchmarking.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
csbenchmarking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
csbenchmarking.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Csbenchmarking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Csbenchmarking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
csbenchmarking.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CSB Enchmarking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: