3.2 sec in total
98 ms
2.8 sec
218 ms
Visit csharpstar.com now to see the best up-to-date Csharp Star content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about csharpstar.com
C# Tutorials,ASP.net Tutorials,ASP.net Core,Entity Frameowrk Core,Interview questions,csharp tutorials, c-sharp tutorials,C# Interview Questions, csharp Interview questions,c-sharp Interview questions...
Visit csharpstar.comWe analyzed Csharpstar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
csharpstar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.4 s
38/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value2,510 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.336
34/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
98 ms
1029 ms
26 ms
52 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Csharpstar.com, 18% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 18% (10 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Csharpstar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 70.1 kB (26%)
271.5 kB
201.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Csharpstar.com main page is 271.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 115.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Csharp Star needs image optimization as it can save up to 21 B or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 604 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Csharpstar.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (90%)
41
4
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Csharp Star. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
csharpstar.com
98 ms
www.csharpstar.com
1029 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
26 ms
css
52 ms
dashicons.min.css
50 ms
style.min.css
39 ms
style.min.css
42 ms
social-logos.min.css
37 ms
jetpack.css
44 ms
jquery.min.js
48 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
50 ms
adsbygoogle.js
105 ms
q
9 ms
facebook-embed.min.js
77 ms
fitvids.min.js
85 ms
theme.min.js
86 ms
wp-embed.min.js
85 ms
sharing.min.js
87 ms
e-202434.js
34 ms
load.sumo.com
328 ms
loading.gif
212 ms
sdk.js
304 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
324 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
358 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
392 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
389 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
390 ms
count.json
336 ms
g.gif
344 ms
graph.facebook.com
343 ms
count.json
313 ms
graph.facebook.com
426 ms
count.json
342 ms
graph.facebook.com
446 ms
count.json
342 ms
graph.facebook.com
446 ms
count.json
377 ms
graph.facebook.com
446 ms
g.gif
326 ms
g.gif
339 ms
g.gif
335 ms
g.gif
335 ms
g.gif
334 ms
g.gif
371 ms
g.gif
373 ms
g.gif
373 ms
g.gif
373 ms
wARDj0u
6 ms
nNLGlOfl1OzZ1Yksrf7NTe3mN+KAIu1M6sZ2Ten4tSOXV2YmrnejTFF63+6YO55nCh1tdxy0X5xieS3dIKs955QVFcUfQjyYFwAA
5 ms
social-logos.eot
137 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
202 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
175 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
209 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
174 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
201 ms
sdk.js
58 ms
108 ms
csharpstar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
csharpstar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
csharpstar.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Csharpstar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Csharpstar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
csharpstar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Csharp Star. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: