Tools & Wizards About Us
cspackaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cspackaging.com

Single Source Packaging | CS Packaging | Batavia IL

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

470 ms

cspackaging.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cspackaging.com now to see the best up-to-date CS Packaging content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cspackaging.com

Our mission is to be the single answer to all of our customers packaging needs. You have access to products, pricing, ordering and tracking information.

Visit cspackaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cspackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cspackaging.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cspackaging.com

92 ms

www.cspackaging.com

198 ms

module_26930989742_Site_Search_Input_Store_Search.min.css

221 ms

module_23666969547_va-text-icons-background.min.css

57 ms

js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Cspackaging.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (548 ms) belongs to the original domain Cspackaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cspackaging.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 88.3 kB

  • Original 101.7 kB
  • After minification 93.6 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 529 B

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CS Packaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 145.1 kB
  • After minification 145.1 kB
  • After compression 136.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 61.2 kB
  • After compression 43.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cspackaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CS Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cspackaging.com

cspackaging.com

92 ms

www.cspackaging.com

www.cspackaging.com

198 ms

module_26930989742_Site_Search_Input_Store_Search.min.css

module_26930989742_Site_Search_Input_Store_Search.min.css

221 ms

module_23666969547_va-text-icons-background.min.css

module_23666969547_va-text-icons-background.min.css

57 ms

js

js

75 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

76 ms

vanadyl_2017.min.css

vanadyl_2017.min.css

271 ms

current.js

current.js

77 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

54 ms

embed.js

embed.js

64 ms

project.js

project.js

68 ms

project.js

project.js

73 ms

v2.js

v2.js

125 ms

va-slicknav.min.js

va-slicknav.min.js

365 ms

va-slick.min.js

va-slick.min.js

269 ms

va-wow.min.js

va-wow.min.js

364 ms

va-magnific-popup.min.js

va-magnific-popup.min.js

534 ms

va-TweenMax.min.js

va-TweenMax.min.js

432 ms

va-ScrollToPlugin.min.js

va-ScrollToPlugin.min.js

548 ms

vanadyl_2017.min.js

vanadyl_2017.min.js

471 ms

2618411.js

2618411.js

431 ms

index.js

index.js

377 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

Slice%203%20(23).png

Slice%203%20(23).png

419 ms

b2f628dd-31a4-42ee-860a-d0c0fe4eea06.png

b2f628dd-31a4-42ee-860a-d0c0fe4eea06.png

89 ms

csp-banner-1-1-1%20%281%29.webp

csp-banner-1-1-1%20%281%29.webp

165 ms

iStock-1225833689.jpg

iStock-1225833689.jpg

166 ms

slide1-1-1.webp

slide1-1-1.webp

413 ms

logo%20(1).webp

logo%20(1).webp

204 ms

pregis_home_logo-1.webp

pregis_home_logo-1.webp

221 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

479 ms

bestpack-logo.webp

bestpack-logo.webp

333 ms

logopoly.webp

logopoly.webp

527 ms

paragonfilms-logo.webp

paragonfilms-logo.webp

509 ms

menu-logo-notag%20(1).webp

menu-logo-notag%20(1).webp

499 ms

embed

embed

207 ms

corrugated-2225141_1920-1.jpg

corrugated-2225141_1920-1.jpg

346 ms

iStock-1323983873.jpg

iStock-1323983873.jpg

375 ms

iStock-1182868959.jpg

iStock-1182868959.jpg

393 ms

iStock-1163916840.jpg

iStock-1163916840.jpg

402 ms

corrugated-2225987_1920.jpg

corrugated-2225987_1920.jpg

426 ms

va-icons.ttf

va-icons.ttf

58 ms

js

js

113 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

61 ms

banner.js

banner.js

78 ms

2618411.js

2618411.js

47 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

25 ms

search.js

search.js

12 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

25 ms

main.js

main.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

cspackaging.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

cspackaging.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cspackaging.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cspackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cspackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cspackaging.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CS Packaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: