12.7 sec in total
1.8 sec
10.4 sec
497 ms
Visit cssnig.com now to see the best up-to-date Cssnig content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cssnig.com
CSS Pvt. Ltd is a professional safety training and consultancy organization. We assist our client to manage health, safety, security, environmental (HSSE) and business risk.
Visit cssnig.comWe analyzed Cssnig.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
cssnig.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value13.7 s
2/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
1766 ms
292 ms
156 ms
889 ms
581 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Cssnig.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cssnig.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)
1.8 MB
603.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Cssnig.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cssnig images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 824.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 824.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cssnig.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (79%)
77
16
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cssnig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cssnig.com
1766 ms
global.css
292 ms
css
156 ms
jquery.min.js
889 ms
common.js
581 ms
jqueryuicss.css
590 ms
tbtestimonials.css
592 ms
styles.css
875 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
149 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.css
938 ms
social.css
938 ms
jquery.validate.css
1151 ms
css
205 ms
genericons.css
1169 ms
style.css
1452 ms
www.cssnig.com
1328 ms
pagenavi-css.css
1416 ms
jquery.js
1750 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1556 ms
jqueryuijs.js
2499 ms
wt_rmrh-debug.js
1639 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
1720 ms
tbtestimonials.js
1796 ms
all.js
412 ms
googletracking.js
1911 ms
head_twitterlinkedin.js
1936 ms
jquery.validate.js
2024 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2049 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
2053 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2143 ms
scripts.js
2245 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
2337 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
2368 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
2367 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
2425 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
2624 ms
jquery.ui.slider.min.js
2738 ms
jquery.ui.button.min.js
2795 ms
jquery-ui-sliderAccess.js
2795 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
2798 ms
in.js
142 ms
functions.js
2791 ms
social.js
2601 ms
bodybghome.jpg
1180 ms
logo.png
1179 ms
mail.png
1177 ms
contact-icon.png
1208 ms
client-icon.png
1287 ms
phone.png
1324 ms
banners2-990x340.jpg
1714 ms
bg-caption.png
1703 ms
slide11-990x340.jpg
3602 ms
banners3-990x340.jpg
2095 ms
iosh-courses1-200x128.jpg
1609 ms
nebosh-courses-200x128.jpg
1611 ms
elearning-courses1-200x128.jpg
3286 ms
client-logos.jpg
3800 ms
what-next.jpg
4215 ms
why-us.jpg
2054 ms
companylogo.png
2268 ms
WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA
23 ms
readmore.jpg
2327 ms
analytics.js
143 ms
DBNYwxDZ_pA
283 ms
ajax-loader.gif
2484 ms
widgets.js
188 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
296 ms
buttonbg.jpg
2537 ms
facebook.png
2779 ms
twitter.png
2835 ms
collect
75 ms
googleplus.png
3003 ms
linkedin.png
2965 ms
www-embed-player-vfl-z2BtK.css
244 ms
www-embed-player.js
332 ms
youtube.png
3073 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
129 ms
ad_status.js
110 ms
plusone.js
154 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
30 ms
cssnig.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
cssnig.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
cssnig.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cssnig.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cssnig.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cssnig.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cssnig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: