1 sec in total
28 ms
570 ms
422 ms
Click here to check amazing CSSPeeper content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about csspeeper.com
Get access to the useful styles with our Chrome extension. Our mission is to let Designers focus on design, and spend as little time as possible digging in a code.
Visit csspeeper.comWe analyzed Csspeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 992 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
csspeeper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value4.0 s
51/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.265
46/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
28 ms
142 ms
324 ms
13 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Csspeeper.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (324 ms) belongs to the original domain Csspeeper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 267.1 kB (14%)
2.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Csspeeper.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CSSPeeper needs image optimization as it can save up to 246.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (12%)
33
29
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CSSPeeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
csspeeper.com
28 ms
main.css
142 ms
hero-img-bg.png
324 ms
hero-img-colors.png
13 ms
inspec-elements-bg.png
155 ms
inspec-elements-ui.png
149 ms
browse-colors-bg.png
102 ms
browse-colors-ui.png
76 ms
export-assets-bg.png
161 ms
export-assets-ui.png
321 ms
1.png
141 ms
4.png
146 ms
3.png
152 ms
5.png
152 ms
2.png
174 ms
6.png
301 ms
css
32 ms
uxxbmrred4vz.js
133 ms
sdk.js
26 ms
widgets.js
31 ms
logo-svg.svg
129 ms
inspect-elements-icon.svg
166 ms
browse-colors-ico.svg
137 ms
export-assets-ico.svg
194 ms
arrow.svg
208 ms
p-icon-footer.svg
287 ms
sdk.js
17 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
37 ms
107 ms
settings
122 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
23 ms
Montserrat-Medium.otf
159 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
4 ms
embeds
26 ms
embeds
56 ms
follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html
14 ms
tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html
22 ms
csspeeper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
csspeeper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
csspeeper.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Csspeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Csspeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
csspeeper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CSSPeeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: