Tools & Wizards About Us
ctbackcenter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

ctbackcenter.com

Connecticut Back Center | Neck & Back Pain Specialists in Vernon, CT

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

ctbackcenter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing CT Back Center content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ctbackcenter.com

CBC's back specialists provide treatment for neck pain, chronic lower back pain, scoliosis, sciatica & other spine-related conditions in Central CT.

Visit ctbackcenter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ctbackcenter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ctbackcenter.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,180 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ctbackcenter.com

87 ms

ctbackcenter.com

149 ms

jquery.min.js

80 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

79 ms

icons.min.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Ctbackcenter.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Js.callrail.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (676 ms) belongs to the original domain Ctbackcenter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 400.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ctbackcenter.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 361.6 kB

  • Original 419.0 kB
  • After minification 414.7 kB
  • After compression 57.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 361.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CT Back Center images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 30.4 kB

  • Original 492.6 kB
  • After minification 492.6 kB
  • After compression 462.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (47%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CT Back Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ctbackcenter.com

ctbackcenter.com

87 ms

ctbackcenter.com

ctbackcenter.com

149 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

80 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

79 ms

icons.min.js

icons.min.js

80 ms

js

js

94 ms

image_1469_C9A1F831-81DD-4285-9E19-0E8B2B18F6CA.svg

image_1469_C9A1F831-81DD-4285-9E19-0E8B2B18F6CA.svg

504 ms

swap.js

swap.js

49 ms

popupWidget.min.js

popupWidget.min.js

65 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

67 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

69 ms

theme.js

theme.js

192 ms

index.js

index.js

109 ms

index.js

index.js

109 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

110 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

192 ms

common.js

common.js

113 ms

api.js

api.js

92 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

277 ms

index.js

index.js

411 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

409 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

410 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

409 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

430 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

442 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

442 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

445 ms

cbc-200.png

cbc-200.png

496 ms

slidec2new.jpg

slidec2new.jpg

504 ms

slidec1new.jpg

slidec1new.jpg

583 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

505 ms

slideb1.jpg

slideb1.jpg

586 ms

5-1.jpg

5-1.jpg

507 ms

dr-jesse-eisler.jpg

dr-jesse-eisler.jpg

561 ms

andrew.jpg

andrew.jpg

560 ms

background1.png

background1.png

558 ms

user-avt-1.png

user-avt-1.png

558 ms

Untitled-design-69-400x250.jpg

Untitled-design-69-400x250.jpg

586 ms

thumbnail_84D151F8-0CC7-4F25-ABEA-29CA02F34838-Large-400x250.jpeg

thumbnail_84D151F8-0CC7-4F25-ABEA-29CA02F34838-Large-400x250.jpeg

585 ms

WFC_QR_Advert_landscape-400x250.jpg

WFC_QR_Advert_landscape-400x250.jpg

586 ms

calltoaction-bg.jpg

calltoaction-bg.jpg

632 ms

backpain-3.jpg

backpain-3.jpg

676 ms

backpain.jpg

backpain.jpg

644 ms

backpain-2.jpg

backpain-2.jpg

603 ms

nass-logo.png

nass-logo.png

556 ms

orthoinfo-logo.gif

orthoinfo-logo.gif

555 ms

hartford-hospital-logo.gif

hartford-hospital-logo.gif

596 ms

uconn-logo.gif

uconn-logo.gif

597 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

31 ms

yale-logo2.png

yale-logo2.png

576 ms

naon2-logo.png

naon2-logo.png

590 ms

acs-logo-1.png

acs-logo-1.png

602 ms

srsh-logo.jpg

srsh-logo.jpg

600 ms

external_forms.js

external_forms.js

284 ms

swap_session.json

swap_session.json

328 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

238 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

275 ms

Accessibility Review

ctbackcenter.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ctbackcenter.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ctbackcenter.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ctbackcenter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ctbackcenter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ctbackcenter.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CT Back Center. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: