6 sec in total
942 ms
4.7 sec
399 ms
Welcome to ctcr.in homepage info - get ready to check CTCR best content right away, or after learning these important things about ctcr.in
Visit ctcr.inWe analyzed Ctcr.in page load time and found that the first response time was 942 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ctcr.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
942 ms
89 ms
231 ms
93 ms
91 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Ctcr.in, 18% (16 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ctcr.in.
Page size can be reduced by 143.9 kB (11%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ctcr.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 521.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CTCR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ctcr.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)
79
21
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CTCR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ctcr.in
942 ms
style.min.css
89 ms
view.css
231 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
93 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
91 ms
styles.css
461 ms
learndash_quiz_front.min.css
472 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.css
489 ms
learndash_lesson_video.min.css
488 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
484 ms
grid-system.css
498 ms
style.css
696 ms
header-layout-centered-bottom-bar.css
707 ms
element-team-member.css
717 ms
element-icon-with-text.css
728 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
732 ms
cf7.css
738 ms
css
111 ms
responsive.css
926 ms
flickity.css
942 ms
skin-material.css
952 ms
menu-dynamic.css
969 ms
learndash.min.css
981 ms
js_composer.min.css
979 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
1160 ms
style.css
1176 ms
css
67 ms
jetpack.css
76 ms
jquery.min.js
88 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
86 ms
animate.min.css
1239 ms
style-non-critical.css
1241 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1241 ms
core.css
1241 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
1440 ms
slide-out-right-hover.css
1439 ms
image-cdn.js
1440 ms
index.js
1474 ms
index.js
1484 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1475 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1669 ms
priority.js
1674 ms
transit.min.js
1673 ms
waypoints.js
1715 ms
api.js
107 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
84 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
84 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
83 ms
e-202410.js
83 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1712 ms
hoverintent.min.js
1507 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1453 ms
anime.min.js
1446 ms
flickity.js
1436 ms
superfish.js
1478 ms
init.js
1732 ms
touchswipe.min.js
1483 ms
learndash.js
1440 ms
index.js
1443 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1440 ms
iiser_logo_resize.png
276 ms
bajaj.png
1000 ms
pccm.png
275 ms
cropped-icgalogo.png
276 ms
RTPCR-logo2_resize.png
286 ms
bajaj.png
287 ms
event_icon-removebg.png
279 ms
swasthya.jpg
286 ms
TCS_.png
284 ms
STRAND.png
285 ms
UEA.png
284 ms
PRANA.png
326 ms
ChennaiBreastCentre.jpg
325 ms
stryker.png
324 ms
ICGA.png
325 ms
TataMemorialHospital.jpg
324 ms
Ctcr_office_pic.png
1273 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
56 ms
font
166 ms
font
167 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1777 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
101 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
128 ms
font
165 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
165 ms
icomoon.woff
936 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
460 ms
ctcr.in accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ctcr.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ctcr.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ctcr.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ctcr.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ctcr.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CTCR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: