6.1 sec in total
737 ms
4 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Ctoop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ctoop.com
Visit ctoop.comWe analyzed Ctoop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 737 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ctoop.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value1,820 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
737 ms
173 ms
207 ms
208 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 147 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Ctoop.com, 20% (30 requests) were made to Yumpu.com and 8% (12 requests) were made to Public.slidesharecdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ctoop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 837.6 kB (41%)
2.0 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ctoop.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 835.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ctoop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 419.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.6 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 322.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ctoop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 322.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (53%)
140
66
The browser has sent 140 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ctoop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ctoop.com
737 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
styles.css
207 ms
main.min.css
208 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
208 ms
jquery.js
1004 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
888 ms
ads.js
5 ms
jquery.form.min.js
209 ms
scripts.js
244 ms
smoothscroll.js
243 ms
wp-embed.min.js
244 ms
ga.js
4 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
UGkGwsXhmiBCS6Ns
350 ms
embed
44 ms
20214765
297 ms
Co2-YouBuy-Badge1.png
553 ms
Backgrd2.jpg
294 ms
CTOOPHeader1.png
352 ms
Ranking_Loss_Google_May_2014-300x246.png
281 ms
Matt_Cutts_Google_Penguin_4_Penalty-300x140.png
285 ms
Google_Pinguin_2-0-150x150.png
285 ms
Greenshot-image-editor-gutscheine-SISTRIX-Toolbox-Google-Chrome_2013-05-22_2013-05-22_18-07-40-300x159.png
415 ms
Anmelden-Google-Chrome_2013-05-16_15-35-45-300x209.png
666 ms
Lean-Analytics-@-MicroConf-Windows-Internet-Explorer_2013-05-10_11-23-46-300x223.png
514 ms
Lean-Analytics-@-MicroConf-Windows-Internet-Explorer_2013-05-10_11-24-52-300x220.png
549 ms
Lean-Analytics-@-MicroConf-Windows-Internet-Explorer_2013-05-10_11-26-44-300x210.png
550 ms
socialicons.png
549 ms
ads-common.js
3 ms
embed
257 ms
PWHcRoQuXQI
246 ms
cm
249 ms
sdk.js
229 ms
www-embed-player-vfl-z2BtK.css
100 ms
www-embed-player.js
188 ms
likebox.php
272 ms
511TFmqGSmL._SL80_.jpg
50 ms
38 ms
combined_jquery.js
46 ms
global.js
45 ms
combined_li_tracking.js
45 ms
font-awesome.css
62 ms
combined_presentation.css
101 ms
combined_player_presentation.js
106 ms
combined_old_embed.js
123 ms
222 ms
xd_arbiter.php
193 ms
xd_arbiter.php
289 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
161 ms
YumpuMagazine.min.js
159 ms
combined_base.js
120 ms
beacon.js
116 ms
__utm.gif
100 ms
lean-analytics-microconf-1-638.jpg
163 ms
20214765
203 ms
1x1.gif
139 ms
logo_embed_20x20_v1.png
138 ms
lead-form
327 ms
__utm.gif
88 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
105 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
175 ms
ad_status.js
137 ms
webfont.js
70 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
2753581056.js
120 ms
analytics.min.js
187 ms
ima3.js
109 ms
createjs-2015.11.26.min.js
62 ms
icons.svg
45 ms
status
91 ms
90rQCGwGlZ0.css
147 ms
6oFNtkjyQt1.css
219 ms
QWNoq83tSF9.js
238 ms
wz0kTgXOBWb.js
286 ms
bsJz-HWENZN.js
266 ms
YACc84TyeVr.js
266 ms
collect
61 ms
juiceClasses-min.js
64 ms
css
61 ms
collect
148 ms
p
317 ms
ga-audiences
39 ms
bat.js
241 ms
fbevents.js
42 ms
9e7fb24c6e48df26c894b9d2959ebf88dfbc83cd
119 ms
project.js
83 ms
w.js
144 ms
atrk.js
31 ms
prum.min.js
31 ms
chartbeat.js
41 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
22 ms
atrk.gif
108 ms
17 ms
ping
87 ms
test.png
174 ms
228042_264595203643320_362450393_n.jpg
200 ms
401470_264595940309913_1980389597_n.jpg
224 ms
11051956_10152731940016569_5663947016716366693_n.jpg
243 ms
12115553_934711286600605_4846901413400452308_n.jpg
481 ms
1379841_10150004552801901_469209496895221757_n.jpg
250 ms
14068_10152670117557555_3887861851268733958_n.jpg
482 ms
12250048_749422255202030_7010888529838288151_n.jpg
480 ms
390527_170734436396892_727909466_n.jpg
250 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
82 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
81 ms
t
123 ms
resync.gif
50 ms
intercom.e4ddae8d.js
49 ms
remote
423 ms
17491729
199 ms
129 ms
echo.515e8809.js
23 ms
ping
96 ms
remote
113 ms
remote
107 ms
remote
186 ms
remote
187 ms
remote
187 ms
remote
190 ms
remote
219 ms
remote
225 ms
remote
284 ms
remote
502 ms
remote
486 ms
remote
511 ms
remote
474 ms
remote
325 ms
remote
387 ms
remote
437 ms
remote
501 ms
remote
553 ms
remote
601 ms
remote
593 ms
remote
615 ms
remote
720 ms
remote
620 ms
remote
789 ms
remote
751 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
22 ms
HvwRARrZoLy.js
21 ms
rum-track
32 ms
remote
458 ms
remote
410 ms
ctoop.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ctoop.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ctoop.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ctoop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ctoop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ctoop.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ctoop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: