2.6 sec in total
206 ms
2.2 sec
223 ms
Visit cuge.org now to see the best up-to-date Cuge content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cuge.org
cuge - customer-generated evaluation of websites - reliability, services and goods quality, delivery times, response times
Visit cuge.orgWe analyzed Cuge.org page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cuge.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
45/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
206 ms
216 ms
224 ms
20 ms
248 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Cuge.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cuge.org.
Page size can be reduced by 60.4 kB (24%)
250.0 kB
189.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Cuge.org main page is 250.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 96.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cuge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 88 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (73%)
51
14
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cuge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cuge.org
206 ms
www.cuge.org
216 ms
xajax_core.js
224 ms
css
20 ms
style.css
248 ms
sc.js
244 ms
nav_en.js
240 ms
show_ads.js
70 ms
js
55 ms
check_website_on.png
220 ms
evaluate_website_on.png
225 ms
add_website_on.png
237 ms
website_owners_on.png
232 ms
search_on.png
265 ms
join_on.png
265 ms
signin_on.png
447 ms
button_check_en.png
445 ms
button_check_en_on.png
442 ms
button_evaluate_en_on.png
436 ms
button_add_en_on.png
452 ms
siteback.gif
454 ms
head.png
656 ms
check_website.png
669 ms
evaluate_website.png
669 ms
add_website.png
668 ms
website_owners.png
665 ms
search.png
666 ms
join.png
867 ms
signin.png
909 ms
cugelogo.png
910 ms
back_input.png
898 ms
button_evaluate_en.png
901 ms
button_add_en.png
894 ms
back_container.png
979 ms
customer-generated-evaluation.jpg
1307 ms
link.png
1125 ms
10.png
1135 ms
3.png
1134 ms
1.png
1131 ms
2.png
1141 ms
9.png
1317 ms
0.png
1328 ms
8.png
1332 ms
7.png
1325 ms
font
23 ms
4.png
1331 ms
adsbygoogle.js
142 ms
like.php
205 ms
js
49 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
collect
14 ms
6.png
1243 ms
5.png
1248 ms
w9py8-RGams.js
23 ms
FEppCFCt76d.png
17 ms
footer.png
1243 ms
cuge.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
cuge.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
cuge.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cuge.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cuge.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cuge.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cuge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: