Tools & Wizards About Us
cunninghamstone.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cunninghamstone.com

Mason Contractors | Masonry Contracting | Cunningham Stone Limited

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

362 ms

cunninghamstone.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cunninghamstone.com homepage info - get ready to check Cunningham Stone best content right away, or after learning these important things about cunninghamstone.com

Cunningham Stone Limited are specialist mason contractors with clients across the UK. We offer a range of masonry contracting services, from supply to design & fit

Visit cunninghamstone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cunninghamstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cunninghamstone.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value37.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cunninghamstone.com

179 ms

www.cunninghamstone.com

2040 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

89 ms

style.min.css

178 ms

classic-themes.min.css

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Cunninghamstone.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cunninghamstone.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cunninghamstone.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

  • Original 62.8 kB
  • After minification 56.7 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 109.9 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cunningham Stone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 78.2 kB

  • Original 297.2 kB
  • After minification 297.2 kB
  • After compression 219.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 79.1 kB

  • Original 134.3 kB
  • After minification 134.3 kB
  • After compression 55.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cunninghamstone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (48%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cunningham Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cunninghamstone.com

cunninghamstone.com

179 ms

www.cunninghamstone.com

www.cunninghamstone.com

2040 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

89 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

178 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

251 ms

styles.css

styles.css

259 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

332 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

336 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

255 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

271 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

353 ms

js

js

70 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

29 ms

index.js

index.js

371 ms

index.js

index.js

372 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

457 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

499 ms

what-input.min.js

what-input.min.js

457 ms

jquery.main.min.js

jquery.main.min.js

542 ms

api.js

api.js

63 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

458 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

458 ms

index.js

index.js

458 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

106 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

216 ms

coloured-logo.png

coloured-logo.png

389 ms

black-logo.png

black-logo.png

388 ms

coloured-symbol.png

coloured-symbol.png

386 ms

carlow-2-900x560.jpg

carlow-2-900x560.jpg

387 ms

IMG_9176-scaled.jpg

IMG_9176-scaled.jpg

472 ms

IMG_9434-scaled.jpg

IMG_9434-scaled.jpg

499 ms

derriaghy6.jpg

derriaghy6.jpg

397 ms

UCL.svg

UCL.svg

392 ms

UB.svg

UB.svg

389 ms

RAM.svg

RAM.svg

394 ms

BCC.svg

BCC.svg

472 ms

IET.svg

IET.svg

473 ms

cta-bg.png

cta-bg.png

618 ms

white-logo-stacked.png

white-logo-stacked.png

475 ms

js

js

109 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

100 ms

helvetica_neue_medium.woff

helvetica_neue_medium.woff

367 ms

helvetica_neue_thin.woff

helvetica_neue_thin.woff

409 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

408 ms

destination

destination

156 ms

fetalmed4-1840x900.jpg

fetalmed4-1840x900.jpg

224 ms

hillhouse5-1840x900.jpg

hillhouse5-1840x900.jpg

252 ms

crg12-1840x900.jpg

crg12-1840x900.jpg

240 ms

NWTH-12-1-1840x900.jpg

NWTH-12-1-1840x900.jpg

323 ms

PRIMARK-2-1840x900.jpg

PRIMARK-2-1840x900.jpg

477 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

317 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

345 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

325 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

345 ms

collect

collect

82 ms

collect

collect

80 ms

js

js

74 ms

Accessibility Review

cunninghamstone.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cunninghamstone.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cunninghamstone.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cunninghamstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cunninghamstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cunninghamstone.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cunningham Stone. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: