Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

curatewellness.co

CurateWellness.co – Berita Indonesia Terbaru

Page Load Speed

11.6 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

5.7 sec

curatewellness.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Curate Wellness content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about curatewellness.co

Pia Beck is a business coach known for turning pain points into action items via strategy, systems, steps. She combines purpose + process to help emerging and established entrepreneurs start or scale ...

Visit curatewellness.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Curatewellness.co page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

curatewellness.co performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

curatewell.co

131 ms

mi0GaUrkLc_yk3ZQW7LqQgemmUjCNxuERyj7qJj2fLCfeGtBfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDmKFDS3wcIXFRJ3jR6u5AIhwD4Kw2SowsnvMKG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0jamkjWs8ihmCdeFzO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdP37O1FUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCjAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCjAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCjWw0dA9CjamkjWs8ihmCdfoRdkURiW4yiemaZAUCjhv0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaikoRiW4yiemaZAUCOcFzOYiaikoRiW4yiemaZAUCjhv0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlJ6NcScmTZhyXOA4TZku3ScvKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifJ4ShNc-AIlSY4zH6GJCTMgIMMjgfMfH6GJlTMgIMMjgPMfH6GJCoMgIMMj2KMfH6qJyB9bMs6IJMJ7fbRxmgMgeM96MKG4f54oIMIjgKMfH6qJ6m9bMs6YJMJ7f6Riz3IbMy6fJMJ7f6RLz3IbMy62JMJ7f6RRz3IbMy6IJMJ7f6Ryz3IbMy6BJMJ7f6R8z3IbMy6eJMJ7f6Rdz3IbMy6YJMJ7f6R6z3IbMy6FJMJ7f6RGz3IbMy6bJMJ7f6RSz3IbMy6sJMHbMLPWCxSB.js

319 ms

cldr-resource-pack-5cda955c6e06076e623b6-min.en-US.js

346 ms

common-vendors-31a6eca873aebefe5db6a-min.en-US.js

484 ms

common-74bccd230ee03a4cb6e00-min.en-US.js

563 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Curatewellness.co, 33% (25 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 13% (10 requests) were made to Curatewell.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Curatewell.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 223.7 kB (34%)

Content Size

650.4 kB

After Optimization

426.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Curatewellness.co main page is 650.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 343.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 223.2 kB

  • Original 258.0 kB
  • After minification 236.2 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 343.9 kB
  • After minification 343.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Curate Wellness images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 531 B

  • Original 48.4 kB
  • After minification 48.4 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (22%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Curate Wellness. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

curatewellness.co accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

curatewellness.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

curatewellness.co SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Curatewellness.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Curatewellness.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Curate Wellness. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: