Tools & Wizards About Us
curatronic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

curatronic.com

Curatron Pulsed electromagnetic field devices by Curatronic Ltd. Jerusalem

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

935 ms

Page Rendered

156 ms

curatronic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit curatronic.com now to see the best up-to-date Curatronic content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about curatronic.com

PEMF for Pain relief, Arthritis, Fibromyalgia, Osteoporosis, Sports injuries, Anti Aging. Pulsed Magnetic Field therapy: Curatron PEMF devices by Curatronic offer a choice of different PEMF devices an...

Visit curatronic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Curatronic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

curatronic.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

curatronic.com

131 ms

www.curatronic.com

92 ms

bt

84 ms

require.min.js

43 ms

main-r.min.js

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Curatronic.com, 58% (33 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 19% (11 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Stats.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (74%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

790.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Curatronic.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 111.3 kB

  • Original 132.6 kB
  • After minification 132.4 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 121.2 kB
  • After minification 117.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Curatronic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB
  • After compression 639.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 64.6 kB

  • Original 76.3 kB
  • After minification 72.0 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Curatronic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (72%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Curatronic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

curatronic.com

curatronic.com

131 ms

www.curatronic.com

www.curatronic.com

92 ms

bt

bt

84 ms

require.min.js

require.min.js

43 ms

main-r.min.js

main-r.min.js

50 ms

viewer.css

viewer.css

49 ms

dynamicmodel

dynamicmodel

24 ms

7eebe5_894f301a83bcddd07b93390e97181c34_555.json.z

7eebe5_894f301a83bcddd07b93390e97181c34_555.json.z

52 ms

7eebe5_13f017e0d286d39a509e5b4b0e896af7_533.json.z

7eebe5_13f017e0d286d39a509e5b4b0e896af7_533.json.z

131 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

126 ms

bt

bt

134 ms

skins.min.js

skins.min.js

121 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

49 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

46 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

127 ms

react-with-addons.min.js

react-with-addons.min.js

47 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

20 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

116 ms

layout.min.js

layout.min.js

118 ms

tpa.min.js

tpa.min.js

118 ms

fonts.min.js

fonts.min.js

119 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

120 ms

swfobject.min.js

swfobject.min.js

120 ms

mousetrap.min.js

mousetrap.min.js

118 ms

tweenEngine.min.js

tweenEngine.min.js

119 ms

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

119 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

119 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

119 ms

widgets.min.js

widgets.min.js

119 ms

experiment.js

experiment.js

120 ms

render.min.js

render.min.js

120 ms

wixappsCore.min.js

wixappsCore.min.js

123 ms

wixappsClassics.min.js

wixappsClassics.min.js

120 ms

wixappsBuilder.min.js

wixappsBuilder.min.js

121 ms

zepto.min.js

zepto.min.js

115 ms

color.min.js

color.min.js

116 ms

react-dom-server.min.js

react-dom-server.min.js

174 ms

bt

bt

77 ms

latin.css

latin.css

10 ms

dc.js

dc.js

222 ms

bt

bt

218 ms

7eebe5_7ed8f261d7d245849e579c5749d58be8.jpg

7eebe5_7ed8f261d7d245849e579c5749d58be8.jpg

111 ms

b1cd13f9d4dfb1450bbb325285106177.png

b1cd13f9d4dfb1450bbb325285106177.png

29 ms

79d828dc54b74458bff28f6ab9f863e9.png

79d828dc54b74458bff28f6ab9f863e9.png

30 ms

7eebe5_241d5ce4610244ed8b9acda6d867e6e7.jpg

7eebe5_241d5ce4610244ed8b9acda6d867e6e7.jpg

40 ms

7eebe5_a09f098337d84d8f83ded3a80363a614.jpg

7eebe5_a09f098337d84d8f83ded3a80363a614.jpg

37 ms

7eebe5_370d0a38f62949ffaaa72b9d1a64cd77.jpg

7eebe5_370d0a38f62949ffaaa72b9d1a64cd77.jpg

40 ms

7eebe5_8ad31247c9734942af67d3289cb89b0c.jpg

7eebe5_8ad31247c9734942af67d3289cb89b0c.jpg

45 ms

7eebe5_177164b5569d41babfe2f32b4b959d62.png

7eebe5_177164b5569d41babfe2f32b4b959d62.png

43 ms

7eebe5_e0bb6e32f9b345e7919543feaebf0305.jpg

7eebe5_e0bb6e32f9b345e7919543feaebf0305.jpg

43 ms

bt

bt

39 ms

bt

bt

39 ms

bt

bt

39 ms

arrows_white_new3.png

arrows_white_new3.png

40 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

hebrew.css

hebrew.css

5 ms

arabic.css

arabic.css

3 ms

Accessibility Review

curatronic.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

curatronic.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

curatronic.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Curatronic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Curatronic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

curatronic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Curatronic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: