Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

curtainpole.co.uk

Wrought Iron Curtain Poles | 16mm | 25mm | S P Harrison

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

529 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

663 ms

curtainpole.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit curtainpole.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Curtain Pole content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about curtainpole.co.uk

Wrought Iron Curtain Poles and Bay Window Curtain Poles made to order for the perfect fit and look for your home, at truly affordable prices.

Visit curtainpole.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Curtainpole.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 529 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

curtainpole.co.uk performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.curtainpole.co.uk

529 ms

9d473.default.include.4a593c.css

87 ms

9d473.default.include.4fe80c.js

176 ms

style.min.css

333 ms

sfwa.css

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Curtainpole.co.uk, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) belongs to the original domain Curtainpole.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Curtainpole.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 861.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 66.6 kB

  • Original 93.2 kB
  • After minification 93.2 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 20.5 kB

  • Original 861.7 kB
  • After minification 841.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Curtain Pole images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 107.6 kB
  • After minification 107.6 kB
  • After compression 102.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 60.4 kB
  • After minification 60.4 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Curtainpole.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Curtain Pole. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

curtainpole.co.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

curtainpole.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

curtainpole.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Curtainpole.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Curtainpole.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Curtain Pole. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: