Tools & Wizards About Us
cus.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cus.net

Save On Your Utility Bills With Consumer Utility Services

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

473 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

279 ms

cus.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cus.net homepage info - get ready to check Cus best content right away, or after learning these important things about cus.net

Impartial information and advice on saving money on your utility bills and how to be more energy efficient in the home.

Visit cus.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Cus.net page load time and found that the first response time was 473 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cus.net performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.078

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cus.net

473 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

175 ms

layerslider.css

183 ms

css

22 ms

settings.css

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Cus.net, 10% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (473 ms) belongs to the original domain Cus.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 341.1 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

858.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cus.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 685.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 164.4 kB

  • Original 207.4 kB
  • After minification 206.3 kB
  • After compression 43.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 192.5 kB
  • After minification 190.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 129.7 kB

  • Original 685.5 kB
  • After minification 685.5 kB
  • After compression 555.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.7 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 114.5 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 69.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cus.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (65%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cus.net

www.cus.net

473 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

175 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

183 ms

css

css

22 ms

settings.css

settings.css

178 ms

css

css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

style.css

style.css

336 ms

css

css

45 ms

style.css

style.css

228 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

255 ms

animations.css

animations.css

259 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

361 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

378 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

311 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

361 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

404 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

425 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

441 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

105 ms

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

299 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

300 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

455 ms

wp-slimstat.min.js

wp-slimstat.min.js

12 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

332 ms

wp-slimstat.min.js

wp-slimstat.min.js

40 ms

cus-logo1.png

cus-logo1.png

90 ms

tap-hp-lg.jpg

tap-hp-lg.jpg

212 ms

conservatories-homepage.jpg

conservatories-homepage.jpg

213 ms

central-heating-boilers-homepage.jpg

central-heating-boilers-homepage.jpg

88 ms

insulation-homepage.jpg

insulation-homepage.jpg

90 ms

double-glazing-homepage.jpg

double-glazing-homepage.jpg

213 ms

home-energy-homepage.jpg

home-energy-homepage.jpg

212 ms

home-security-homepage.jpg

home-security-homepage.jpg

213 ms

smart-meters-homepage.jpg

smart-meters-homepage.jpg

214 ms

wind-power-homepage.jpg

wind-power-homepage.jpg

270 ms

digital-tv-homepage.jpg

digital-tv-homepage.jpg

269 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

365 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

8 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

21 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

22 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

168 ms

cse.js

cse.js

107 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

20 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

45 ms

default.css

default.css

47 ms

async-ads.js

async-ads.js

35 ms

branding.png

branding.png

31 ms

clear.png

clear.png

71 ms

Accessibility Review

cus.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cus.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cus.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cus.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cus.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cus.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: