Tools & Wizards About Us
cusp.services screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

cusp.services

Business Growth with Proven Strategies - Sales Consulting in India

Page Load Speed

8.4 sec in total

First Response

390 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

881 ms

cusp.services screenshot

About Website

Visit cusp.services now to see the best up-to-date Cusp content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cusp.services

Drive your business to success with our expert guidance and solutions on sales growth. Learn about our proven revenue growth framework whether you are a startup, scaleup or mid-market business. Get st...

Visit cusp.services

Key Findings

We analyzed Cusp.services page load time and found that the first response time was 390 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cusp.services performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cusp.services

390 ms

cusp.services

820 ms

www.cusp.services

1745 ms

download.css

191 ms

dashicons.min.css

382 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Cusp.services, 11% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cusp.services.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 435.6 kB (14%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cusp.services main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 195.6 kB

  • Original 235.4 kB
  • After minification 226.9 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 191.2 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cusp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 47.1 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 66.4 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 278.9 kB
  • After minification 278.9 kB
  • After compression 277.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cusp.services has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (66%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cusp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 47 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cusp.services

cusp.services

390 ms

cusp.services

cusp.services

820 ms

www.cusp.services

www.cusp.services

1745 ms

download.css

download.css

191 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

382 ms

all.css

all.css

564 ms

wpsm-style.css

wpsm-style.css

563 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

569 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

605 ms

imagehover.css

imagehover.css

611 ms

exad-styles.min.css

exad-styles.min.css

861 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

749 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

751 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

757 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

810 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

813 ms

style.basic.css

style.basic.css

934 ms

style-underline.css

style-underline.css

935 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

944 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1008 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1011 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1073 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1121 ms

global.css

global.css

1128 ms

post-77781.css

post-77781.css

1140 ms

fluent-forms-elementor-widget.css

fluent-forms-elementor-widget.css

1208 ms

post-1107.css

post-1107.css

1212 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1287 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1307 ms

ha-1107.css

ha-1107.css

1315 ms

post-394.css

post-394.css

1322 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

1411 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

1630 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1501 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

1493 ms

ha-77781.css

ha-77781.css

1504 ms

css

css

28 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1511 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1610 ms

css

css

40 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1677 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

1550 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

1356 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1176 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

1257 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

1318 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1286 ms

fluent-forms-public.css

fluent-forms-public.css

1313 ms

fluentform-public-default.css

fluentform-public-default.css

1179 ms

scroll-to-top.min.css

scroll-to-top.min.css

1202 ms

asl-prereq.js

asl-prereq.js

1266 ms

asl-core.js

asl-core.js

1230 ms

asl-results-vertical.js

asl-results-vertical.js

1250 ms

asl-load.js

asl-load.js

1209 ms

asl-wrapper.js

asl-wrapper.js

1152 ms

Group-84-1.png

Group-84-1.png

656 ms

Group-2.svg

Group-2.svg

510 ms

Mask-group-11.png

Mask-group-11.png

534 ms

Mask-group-13.png

Mask-group-13.png

538 ms

Mask-group-14.png

Mask-group-14.png

547 ms

Mask-group-15.png

Mask-group-15.png

563 ms

Sapnda-5.png

Sapnda-5.png

1310 ms

AT.svg

AT.svg

1746 ms

dataevolve.svg

dataevolve.svg

910 ms

inube-logo.svg

inube-logo.svg

732 ms

nuveda.svg

nuveda.svg

750 ms

orient-technologies.png

orient-technologies.png

869 ms

power-up-cloud-logo-new.png

power-up-cloud-logo-new.png

919 ms

tecosim.svg

tecosim.svg

939 ms

testpress.svg

testpress.svg

1083 ms

Sam.png

Sam.png

1282 ms

josesh-new.jpeg

josesh-new.jpeg

1105 ms

unnamed-1.png

unnamed-1.png

1128 ms

Ranga-pic-hires-1-768x748-1.png

Ranga-pic-hires-1-768x748-1.png

1297 ms

pexels-photo-669610-805x527-1.jpeg

pexels-photo-669610-805x527-1.jpeg

1292 ms

Screenshot-2022-06-23-at-8.49.03-PM-766x1024-1.png

Screenshot-2022-06-23-at-8.49.03-PM-766x1024-1.png

2451 ms

souvik-banerjee-JLj_NbvlDDo-unsplash-3.jpg

souvik-banerjee-JLj_NbvlDDo-unsplash-3.jpg

1454 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1462 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwOa6lwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwOa6lwVCA.woff

76 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwC66lwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwC66lwVCA.woff

152 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwZ66lwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwZ66lwVCA.woff

149 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwua6lwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwua6lwVCA.woff

149 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwOa-lwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwOa-lwVCA.woff

151 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkw56mlwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkw56mlwVCA.woff

152 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkw3qmlwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkw3qmlwVCA.woff

148 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwuamlwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwuamlwVCA.woff

239 ms

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwkKmlwVCA.woff

7Auhp_Eq3gO_OGbGGhjdwrDdpeIBxlkwkKmlwVCA.woff

190 ms

Ellipse-25.svg

Ellipse-25.svg

1411 ms

6aey4Ky-Vb8Ew8IROpQ.woff

6aey4Ky-Vb8Ew8IROpQ.woff

36 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1336 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1671 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1494 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1538 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1732 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1673 ms

7cHrv4c3ipenMKlEavs7wHk.woff

7cHrv4c3ipenMKlEavs7wHk.woff

152 ms

Accessibility Review

cusp.services accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cusp.services best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cusp.services SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cusp.services can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cusp.services main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cusp.services

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cusp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: