2.9 sec in total
171 ms
1.9 sec
884 ms
Click here to check amazing Custom Filter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about customfilter.net
Designing & Manufacturing Custom Filters For Every Industry Since 1959. Low-volume orders, fast turnaround times. Lean Six Sigma and ISO certified.
Visit customfilter.netWe analyzed Customfilter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
customfilter.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value5.6 s
69/100
10%
171 ms
687 ms
60 ms
55 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Customfilter.net, 17% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (753 ms) belongs to the original domain Customfilter.net.
Page size can be reduced by 219.8 kB (7%)
3.2 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Customfilter.net main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Custom Filter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 66 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Customfilter.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (50%)
26
13
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Custom Filter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
customfilter.net
171 ms
customfilter.net
687 ms
css2
60 ms
all.css
55 ms
bootstrap.min.css
55 ms
329a14f9-1693949773.min.css
98 ms
e3be138e-1642777404.min.js
209 ms
50231030-1622147239.min.js
202 ms
popper.min.js
55 ms
bootstrap.min.js
101 ms
44266861.js
101 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
117 ms
css2
17 ms
Custom-Filter-logo-521x120.png
82 ms
Filter-Manuf-slider-1.jpg
158 ms
custom-filter-pattern.png
279 ms
Custom-Filter-8-cropped-600x338.png
239 ms
Custom-Filter-7-cropped-600x338.png
412 ms
Custom-Filter-1-cropped-600x338.png
282 ms
Custom-Filter-3-cropped-600x338.png
483 ms
Custom-Filter-9-992x950.png
595 ms
TUV-Mark-of-Conformity.png
335 ms
Custom-Filter-4-992x902.png
753 ms
RPF-APC-logos-v2.png
352 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
88 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
100 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
119 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
184 ms
banner.js
120 ms
44266861.js
158 ms
fb.js
120 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
47 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
48 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
47 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
25 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
45 ms
customfilter.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
customfilter.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
customfilter.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Customfilter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Customfilter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
customfilter.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Custom Filter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: