Tools & Wizards About Us
cutoffscores.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

cutoffscores.com

Army Cutoff Scores and Enlisted Promotions - Army Cutoff Scores

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

cutoffscores.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cutoff Scores content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cutoffscores.com

Army Cutoff Scores and Enlisted Promotion to SGT E-5 and SSG E-6. Up to date changes in the Army Promotion Point system along with free resources.

Visit cutoffscores.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cutoffscores.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cutoffscores.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cutoffscores.com

173 ms

ga.js

7 ms

show_ads.js

22 ms

cut-off-logo-600x207.png

59 ms

main-navigation-0-active-19209.png

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Cutoffscores.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 10% (6 requests) were made to C.betrad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (254 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.2 kB (48%)

Content Size

427.0 kB

After Optimization

222.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cutoffscores.com main page is 427.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 232.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 24.1 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 170.7 kB
  • After minification 103.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cutoff Scores needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 117.7 kB

  • Original 232.2 kB
  • After minification 225.5 kB
  • After compression 114.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.7 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (57%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cutoff Scores. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cutoffscores.com

cutoffscores.com

173 ms

ga.js

ga.js

7 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

22 ms

cut-off-logo-600x207.png

cut-off-logo-600x207.png

59 ms

main-navigation-0-active-19209.png

main-navigation-0-active-19209.png

51 ms

main-navigation-1-inactive-19240.png

main-navigation-1-inactive-19240.png

51 ms

main-navigation-2-inactive-19365.png

main-navigation-2-inactive-19365.png

52 ms

main-navigation-3-inactive-19458.png

main-navigation-3-inactive-19458.png

85 ms

main-navigation-4-inactive-19552.png

main-navigation-4-inactive-19552.png

51 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

33 ms

ca-pub-8294359467217702.js

ca-pub-8294359467217702.js

38 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

40 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

61 ms

whv2_001.js

whv2_001.js

22 ms

100px-US_Army_E-9_SGM_svg.png

100px-US_Army_E-9_SGM_svg.png

50 ms

100px-US_Army_E-8_MSG_svg.png

100px-US_Army_E-8_MSG_svg.png

43 ms

2015-sfc-promotion-board.png

2015-sfc-promotion-board.png

96 ms

visit.gif

visit.gif

74 ms

ads

ads

254 ms

osd.js

osd.js

9 ms

ads

ads

210 ms

ads

ads

239 ms

117 ms

adj

adj

77 ms

beacon

beacon

68 ms

adj

adj

87 ms

beacon

beacon

47 ms

14649431376932168769

14649431376932168769

42 ms

abg.js

abg.js

43 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

57 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

31 ms

s

s

29 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

28 ms

28 ms

0

0

132 ms

surly.js

surly.js

106 ms

DeAcero_Mar16_300-x-600-Facebook.gif

DeAcero_Mar16_300-x-600-Facebook.gif

129 ms

lidar.js

lidar.js

12 ms

sbhK2lTE.js

sbhK2lTE.js

12 ms

pixel

pixel

26 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

15 ms

cTrvNaRi.html

cTrvNaRi.html

36 ms

index.html

index.html

237 ms

verify_selector.js

verify_selector.js

177 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

193 ms

pixel

pixel

101 ms

ba.html

ba.html

25 ms

pixel

pixel

45 ms

4.gif

4.gif

36 ms

4311.js

4311.js

27 ms

sd

sd

4 ms

verifyr.js

verifyr.js

30 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

65 ms

0

0

12 ms

bg.png

bg.png

29 ms

adchoices.en.png

adchoices.en.png

64 ms

FaceBody_728x90_logo.gif

FaceBody_728x90_logo.gif

47 ms

FaceBody_728x90_bg.jpg

FaceBody_728x90_bg.jpg

73 ms

box_19_top-right.png

box_19_top-right.png

15 ms

acb650d51c41b04e726b12174049ea23

acb650d51c41b04e726b12174049ea23

40 ms

ci.png

ci.png

27 ms

ui

ui

43 ms

kmvbgogw.f.kk[0]

kmvbgogw.f.kk[0]

50 ms

Accessibility Review

cutoffscores.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cutoffscores.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cutoffscores.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cutoffscores.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cutoffscores.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cutoffscores.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cutoff Scores. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: