Tools & Wizards About Us
cvillebuilders.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cvillebuilders.com

Home — Charlottesville Area Builders

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

394 ms

cvillebuilders.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cvillebuilders.com homepage info - get ready to check Cville Builders best content right away, or after learning these important things about cvillebuilders.com

Astro description

Visit cvillebuilders.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cvillebuilders.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cvillebuilders.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value980 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.974

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cvillebuilders.com

82 ms

cvillebuilders.com

1218 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

25 ms

style.min.css

52 ms

styles.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Cvillebuilders.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Jabuilders.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cvillebuilders.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cvillebuilders.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 52.8 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cville Builders images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 378.6 kB
  • After minification 378.6 kB
  • After compression 375.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 78.1 kB
  • After compression 71.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cvillebuilders.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (65%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cville Builders. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cvillebuilders.com

cvillebuilders.com

82 ms

cvillebuilders.com

cvillebuilders.com

1218 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

25 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

52 ms

styles.css

styles.css

67 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

68 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

76 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

73 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

79 ms

style.css

style.css

80 ms

font.css

font.css

87 ms

splide.min.css

splide.min.css

86 ms

baguettebox.min.css

baguettebox.min.css

90 ms

photonic.min.css

photonic.min.css

96 ms

style.css

style.css

102 ms

style.css

style.css

101 ms

style.css

style.css

105 ms

style.css

style.css

107 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

115 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

117 ms

plugin.js

plugin.js

175 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

125 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

125 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

126 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

135 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

139 ms

script.js

script.js

153 ms

script.js

script.js

154 ms

player.js

player.js

170 ms

client.js

client.js

154 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

36 ms

index.js

index.js

161 ms

index.js

index.js

172 ms

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

176 ms

main.js

main.js

173 ms

api.js

api.js

48 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

185 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

190 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

306 ms

index.js

index.js

276 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

176 ms

style.css

style.css

128 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

205 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

34 ms

CAB-logo-stacked-WHITE.png

CAB-logo-stacked-WHITE.png

34 ms

navigation-menu.png

navigation-menu.png

35 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

166 ms

MAIN-PAGE-Swap-2000x1179.jpg

MAIN-PAGE-Swap-2000x1179.jpg

168 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

195 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

184 ms

award.png

award.png

166 ms

BOCWinner-1.png

BOCWinner-1.png

166 ms

TOT.png

TOT.png

182 ms

cfw-300x150.png

cfw-300x150.png

182 ms

1-1.jpg

1-1.jpg

185 ms

2-2.jpg

2-2.jpg

183 ms

3-2.jpg

3-2.jpg

206 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

204 ms

houzz.png

houzz.png

207 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

80 ms

font

font

71 ms

font

font

129 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

173 ms

font

font

129 ms

Accessibility Review

cvillebuilders.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cvillebuilders.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cvillebuilders.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cvillebuilders.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cvillebuilders.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cvillebuilders.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cville Builders. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: