6.6 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.7 sec
267 ms
Visit cyberclean.net now to see the best up-to-date Cyber Clean content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cyberclean.net
Visit cyberclean.netWe analyzed Cyberclean.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
cyberclean.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
1653 ms
173 ms
23 ms
263 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Cyberclean.net, 14% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cyberclean.weiter.ch. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Cyberclean.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (53%)
3.9 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Cyberclean.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cyber Clean images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 847.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cyberclean.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 847.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (67%)
72
24
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cyber Clean. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cyberclean.net
1653 ms
language-selector.css
173 ms
css
23 ms
layerslider.css
263 ms
css
35 ms
styles.css
189 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
183 ms
settings.css
263 ms
style.css
191 ms
font-awesome.min.css
258 ms
style.min.css
290 ms
stylesheet.min.css
530 ms
style_dynamic.css
292 ms
responsive.min.css
388 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
356 ms
js_composer.css
439 ms
custom_css.css
395 ms
style.css
455 ms
jquery.js
643 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
479 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
595 ms
greensock.js
642 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
557 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
737 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
622 ms
jquery.form.min.js
612 ms
scripts.js
636 ms
qode-like.min.js
656 ms
plugins.js
1054 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
680 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
718 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
730 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
749 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
777 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
781 ms
js
84 ms
default_dynamic.js
810 ms
default.min.js
908 ms
custom_js.js
839 ms
comment-reply.min.js
765 ms
js_composer_front.js
777 ms
wp-embed.min.js
791 ms
sitepress.js
817 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
782 ms
style.css
596 ms
cyberclean_logo.png
513 ms
logo_white.png
512 ms
logo_black.png
512 ms
YouTube-logo-neg-seit-Dezember-2013.svg-Kopie.png
512 ms
en.png
223 ms
de.png
223 ms
blank.gif
222 ms
joker_cc_products_home_office2.png
618 ms
joker_cc_products_car2.png
480 ms
home-cameracare-400x400.png
510 ms
pc11.jpg
511 ms
joker_cc_product_leafcare2.png
1265 ms
pc2.jpg
510 ms
joker_cc_products_roller2.png
550 ms
ga.js
33 ms
Lp2TMRQL_Rk
232 ms
JUZkQqUrzhw
446 ms
mZZVz67ufXE
475 ms
XQl2Sosd0Vg
475 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
180 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
181 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
181 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
181 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
182 ms
kAYTUNvBOXlHHqglRQ0Nlg.woff
182 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
180 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
216 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
215 ms
7DI7Kjvwfuz8m3ExKe6m-Q.woff
216 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
972 ms
__utm.gif
49 ms
collect
259 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
263 ms
www-embed-player.js
289 ms
skin.css
201 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
65 ms
ad_status.js
163 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
135 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
144 ms
skin.png
187 ms
joker_cyberclean_slider1.jpg
335 ms
joker_cyberclean_slider-Car.jpg
720 ms
cyberclean.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cyberclean.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cyberclean.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cyberclean.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cyberclean.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cyberclean.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cyber Clean. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: