8.2 sec in total
2.5 sec
4.6 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Cyberg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cyberg.org
Cyberg Helps you to Grow your Business and Ideas Online by Reading Reviews that help you Choose the best platforms and Applications
Visit cyberg.orgWe analyzed Cyberg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
cyberg.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value2,750 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
2540 ms
300 ms
213 ms
24 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Cyberg.org, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cyberg.org.
Page size can be reduced by 157.0 kB (18%)
879.4 kB
722.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Cyberg.org main page is 879.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 682.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cyberg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 45.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (67%)
107
35
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cyberg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cyberg.org
2540 ms
style.css
300 ms
front_end_style.css
213 ms
dashicons.css
24 ms
desktop_style.css
18 ms
preloader-plus.min.css
215 ms
styles.css
206 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
15 ms
woocommerce.css
210 ms
photoswipe.css
25 ms
reviewer-public.css
43 ms
style.css
63 ms
style.css
79 ms
style.css
90 ms
theme.css
102 ms
style.instances-ho-is-po-no-da-au-se-is.css
118 ms
elementor-icons.css
131 ms
frontend.css
430 ms
swiper.css
325 ms
post-3475.css
141 ms
frontend.css
164 ms
post-731.css
176 ms
post-3771.css
185 ms
frontend_1.css
194 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.js
219 ms
jquery-migrate.js
213 ms
preloader-plus.min.js
420 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
418 ms
add-to-cart.js
223 ms
js.cookie.js
228 ms
woocommerce.js
236 ms
js
65 ms
css
36 ms
css
37 ms
css
36 ms
revolution.addon.particles.css
235 ms
animations.min.css
244 ms
rs6.css
246 ms
register-sw.js
253 ms
scripts.js
530 ms
rbtools.min.js
266 ms
rs6.min.js
293 ms
track-internal-links.js
302 ms
reviewer-front-end.js
330 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.js
588 ms
regenerator-runtime.js
312 ms
wp-polyfill.js
337 ms
hooks.js
334 ms
jquery.ajaxsearchpro-sb.min.js
339 ms
jquery.smartmenus.js
684 ms
revolution.addon.particles.min.js
488 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
411 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.js
572 ms
webpack.runtime.js
405 ms
frontend-modules.js
396 ms
i18n.js
362 ms
frontend.js
361 ms
waypoints.js
353 ms
core.js
345 ms
frontend.js
338 ms
elements-handlers.js
331 ms
cyberg-new-logo-black@2x-pegvjkrt449ot74fe0r95nqxvh441ui5np1i8u1gwm.png
53 ms
dummy.png
54 ms
Asset-3.png
415 ms
image-p2i6tp2bkerwdj8hv3vwow43itk6hcczjfjc8i5an4.png
54 ms
video-editing.png
295 ms
CMS-p2i6ta0wj27b7rucaxdvkzwq0nmb26pa5d3kk2rleo.png
297 ms
sound-editing.png
297 ms
Docs.png
415 ms
writing-tools.png
491 ms
CDN-p2i6t8585e4qkjx2lwkmg0dstvvkmshth3slliudr4.png
498 ms
storage.png
505 ms
file-upload-p2i6tlayt2mr33dyh29eex295a2pmjy26wxebeavc0.png
507 ms
Convert.png
414 ms
search-engines.png
575 ms
seo-tools.png
617 ms
link-shortner-p2id190gzwsxmuiegqnmph8pnvov5tus9x6n7moisg.png
687 ms
mail.png
702 ms
smm-p2i6u5zezff26ijx4b76xrue7r8sbw85lra2vhg7j4.png
513 ms
exchange.png
731 ms
marketing.png
730 ms
Website-Builders.png
686 ms
domain-register.png
775 ms
hosting-p2i6to4hdkqm1x9v0lha4ecmxfot9n997avur86otc.png
839 ms
telecom-p2icssgrhl8156srv30i9m3d71dxvw9r41tbpz82sg.png
652 ms
vpn.png
866 ms
ayment.png
859 ms
organizer.png
887 ms
image1-6-300x200.webp
883 ms
image1-5-300x158.webp
1086 ms
image1-4-300x225.webp
1043 ms
image1-3-300x200.webp
1116 ms
image1-2-300x169.webp
873 ms
image1-1-300x119.webp
881 ms
Social-share-300x300.gif
1181 ms
js
144 ms
analytics.js
138 ms
font
222 ms
font
226 ms
Social-Growth-2-300x300.gif
875 ms
international-SEO-300x103.jpg
827 ms
Noir_medium.woff
1027 ms
font
260 ms
national-seo-1-300x103.jpg
751 ms
collect
163 ms
ocal-300x103.jpg
673 ms
loading-2.svg
684 ms
newload1.gif
746 ms
superpwa-manifest-1.json
106 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
199 ms
cyberg.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
cyberg.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
cyberg.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cyberg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cyberg.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cyberg.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cyberg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: