Tools & Wizards About Us
goodyear2.candidatecare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

goodyear2.candidatecare.com

Migration

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

623 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

118 ms

goodyear2.candidatecare.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to goodyear2.candidatecare.com homepage info - get ready to check Goodyear 2 Candidatecare best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about goodyear2.candidatecare.com

Career Site

Visit goodyear2.candidatecare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodyear2.candidatecare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 623 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodyear2.candidatecare.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

RTI.home

623 ms

functions.js.rez

38 ms

date.js.rez

35 ms

prototype-1.7.1.js.rez

51 ms

calendar-blue.css.rez

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Goodyear2.candidatecare.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to View.atdmt.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) relates to the external source Candidatecare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 32.5 kB (53%)

Content Size

61.4 kB

After Optimization

28.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Goodyear2.candidatecare.com main page is 61.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 41.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 32.5 kB

  • Original 41.0 kB
  • After minification 39.7 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9 B

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodyear 2 Candidatecare. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

RTI.home

RTI.home

623 ms

functions.js.rez

functions.js.rez

38 ms

date.js.rez

date.js.rez

35 ms

prototype-1.7.1.js.rez

prototype-1.7.1.js.rez

51 ms

calendar-blue.css.rez

calendar-blue.css.rez

33 ms

calendar.js.rez

calendar.js.rez

34 ms

calendar-en.js.rez

calendar-en.js.rez

32 ms

calendar-setup.js.rez

calendar-setup.js.rez

48 ms

base64.js.rez

base64.js.rez

47 ms

form.js.rez

form.js.rez

47 ms

dom-drag.js.rez

dom-drag.js.rez

72 ms

combobox.js.rez

combobox.js.rez

78 ms

contenteditable.js.rez

contenteditable.js.rez

72 ms

multicheckbox.js.rez

multicheckbox.js.rez

71 ms

ajax.js.rez

ajax.js.rez

73 ms

color.js.rez

color.js.rez

76 ms

selectable_row.js.rez

selectable_row.js.rez

75 ms

hierarchy.js.rez

hierarchy.js.rez

75 ms

autocomplete.js.rez

autocomplete.js.rez

74 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

103 ms

montrg_LandingPage_10

montrg_LandingPage_10

33 ms

montrg_LandingPageSHT_10

montrg_LandingPageSHT_10

37 ms

montrg_LandingPageMED_10

montrg_LandingPageMED_10

38 ms

shim.dbrez

shim.dbrez

133 ms

shim.gif.rez

shim.gif.rez

22 ms

preview.dbrez

preview.dbrez

24 ms

phone3.dbrez

phone3.dbrez

20 ms

25 ms

hdot.dbrez

hdot.dbrez

103 ms

39 ms

44 ms

SEO Factors

goodyear2.candidatecare.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodyear2.candidatecare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Goodyear2.candidatecare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodyear2.candidatecare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goodyear 2 Candidatecare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: