Tools & Wizards About Us
google.care.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

google.care.com

Babysitters, Nannies, Child Care, Senior & Home Care Services - Care.com

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

401 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

google.care.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Google Care content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about google.care.com

Care.com - Find a local babysitter, nanny, pet sitter, tutor or senior caregiver near you. Post a job for child care, babysitting, tutoring, senior home health care, pet care & housekeeping. Hire an a...

Visit google.care.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Google.care.com page load time and found that the first response time was 401 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

google.care.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

google.care.com

401 ms

g

33 ms

A.bootstrap.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.zznOsSMvoE.css

376 ms

A.nav.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.oH8wWQym_B.css

192 ms

A.WPSLPOnboardMain.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.sdr0hEcwNx.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Google.care.com, 43% (29 requests) were made to S.cdn-care.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (669 ms) relates to the external source Api.amplitude.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 461.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

821.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Google.care.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 711.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 67.6 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 274.5 kB
  • After minification 270.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Google Care images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 241.4 kB

  • Original 711.4 kB
  • After minification 711.4 kB
  • After compression 470.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.4 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 166.9 kB

  • Original 229.6 kB
  • After minification 228.5 kB
  • After compression 62.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Google.care.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (57%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Google Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

google.care.com

google.care.com

401 ms

g

g

33 ms

A.bootstrap.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.zznOsSMvoE.css

A.bootstrap.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.zznOsSMvoE.css

376 ms

A.nav.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.oH8wWQym_B.css

A.nav.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.oH8wWQym_B.css

192 ms

A.WPSLPOnboardMain.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.sdr0hEcwNx.css

A.WPSLPOnboardMain.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.sdr0hEcwNx.css

197 ms

csrfGuard_apiSignature.js

csrfGuard_apiSignature.js

213 ms

A.bucGlobalHeader.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.Ws9gVmYXYw.css

A.bucGlobalHeader.css,qv=240822.pagespeed.cf.Ws9gVmYXYw.css

220 ms

platform.js

platform.js

26 ms

enterprise.js

enterprise.js

44 ms

common.js

common.js

415 ms

bucGlobalHeader.js

bucGlobalHeader.js

279 ms

wpsOnboardLandingPage.js

wpsOnboardLandingPage.js

240 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

104 ms

Y8BSE-LXPMC-9E94A-U8V86-WMUXG

Y8BSE-LXPMC-9E94A-U8V86-WMUXG

231 ms

AT.jpg

AT.jpg

93 ms

AU.jpg

AU.jpg

224 ms

BE.jpg

BE.jpg

227 ms

CA.jpg

CA.jpg

447 ms

CH.jpg

CH.jpg

228 ms

DE.jpg

DE.jpg

137 ms

DK.jpg

DK.jpg

135 ms

ES.jpg

ES.jpg

221 ms

FR.jpg

FR.jpg

228 ms

GB.jpg

GB.jpg

226 ms

IE.jpg

IE.jpg

273 ms

NL.jpg

NL.jpg

228 ms

NO.jpg

NO.jpg

248 ms

NZ.jpg

NZ.jpg

343 ms

SE.jpg

SE.jpg

347 ms

cobrand_2023_google.png

cobrand_2023_google.png

223 ms

css

css

145 ms

g-normal.png

g-normal.png

206 ms

wps-onboard-responsive-bg-desktop.jpg

wps-onboard-responsive-bg-desktop.jpg

170 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

109 ms

app.js

app.js

149 ms

trackVisit.trace1724478759587

trackVisit.trace1724478759587

212 ms

1334885887-0

1334885887-0

165 ms

careAnalytics.js

careAnalytics.js

63 ms

togglePassword.js

togglePassword.js

248 ms

SmartForm.js

SmartForm.js

82 ms

LoginHandler.js

LoginHandler.js

203 ms

_globalListeners.js

_globalListeners.js

136 ms

ValidateCityStateZip.js

ValidateCityStateZip.js

209 ms

CszTypeahead.js

CszTypeahead.js

139 ms

css.min.js

css.min.js

158 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

_careAmplitude.js

_careAmplitude.js

100 ms

_careIterable.js

_careIterable.js

97 ms

careInhouseAnalytics.js

careInhouseAnalytics.js

136 ms

Widget.js

Widget.js

30 ms

typeahead.bundle.min.js

typeahead.bundle.min.js

24 ms

cszTypeahead.css

cszTypeahead.css

65 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

amplitude.min.js

amplitude.min.js

37 ms

jquery.ui.widget.js

jquery.ui.widget.js

198 ms

config.json

config.json

50 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

39 ms

api.amplitude.com

api.amplitude.com

669 ms

75 ms

wpsOnboardLandingPage.css

wpsOnboardLandingPage.css

146 ms

gplusConnect.js

gplusConnect.js

164 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

iframe

iframe

345 ms

s.js

s.js

75 ms

m=base

m=base

5 ms

547365.gif

547365.gif

53 ms

iframerpc

iframerpc

34 ms

Accessibility Review

google.care.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

google.care.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

google.care.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Google.care.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Google.care.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

google.care.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Google Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: