Tools & Wizards About Us
ir.central.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

ir.central.com

Investor Relations :: Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA)

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

397 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

643 ms

ir.central.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ir.central.com homepage info - get ready to check Ir Central best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ir.central.com

Central is a market leader in the Pet and Garden industries. For over 40 years, Central has proudly nurtured happy and healthy homes by bringing innovative and trusted solutions to its consumers and c...

Visit ir.central.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ir.central.com page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ir.central.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ir.central.com

397 ms

oyi1ltz.js

118 ms

font-awesome.min.css

113 ms

ixg2txp.css

201 ms

main.css

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ir.central.com, 59% (33 requests) were made to D1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net and 23% (13 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (557 ms) relates to the external source Geolocation.onetrust.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ir.central.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 83.9 kB

  • Original 95.8 kB
  • After minification 73.3 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.5 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 856.8 kB
  • After minification 805.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ir Central images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 284.9 kB

  • Original 418.4 kB
  • After minification 416.0 kB
  • After compression 133.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 284.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 963.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 955.2 kB
  • After compression 127.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ir.central.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 963.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (49%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ir Central. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ir.central.com

ir.central.com

397 ms

oyi1ltz.js

oyi1ltz.js

118 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

113 ms

ixg2txp.css

ixg2txp.css

201 ms

main.css

main.css

128 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

117 ms

card.js

card.js

114 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

OtAutoBlock.js

174 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

175 ms

ir.stockpr.css

ir.stockpr.css

125 ms

style.css

style.css

169 ms

js

js

176 ms

all.js

all.js

167 ms

require.config.js

require.config.js

166 ms

require.config.js

require.config.js

165 ms

require.config.js

require.config.js

165 ms

require.config.js

require.config.js

168 ms

require.config.js

require.config.js

167 ms

qmodLoader.js

qmodLoader.js

168 ms

browser-check.min.js

browser-check.min.js

166 ms

p.css

p.css

37 ms

c1813dae-9048-41ac-9697-1eb48953906e.json

c1813dae-9048-41ac-9697-1eb48953906e.json

139 ms

New_Logo_white.png

New_Logo_white.png

113 ms

background_image.jpg

background_image.jpg

94 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

458 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

86 ms

image_resized.jpg

image_resized.jpg

88 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

89 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

457 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

453 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

456 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

456 ms

image_resized.jpg

image_resized.jpg

456 ms

image_resized.jpg

image_resized.jpg

550 ms

image_resized.png

image_resized.png

551 ms

Arrow_green_vertical.png%3Fh=51&la=en&w=85&hash=F066299303D0B02CB242DFAA61F526BE8C6D9AE0

Arrow_green_vertical.png%3Fh=51&la=en&w=85&hash=F066299303D0B02CB242DFAA61F526BE8C6D9AE0

551 ms

Green_Footer_Logo_png.png

Green_Footer_Logo_png.png

550 ms

LinkedIn.png%3Fh=56&la=en&w=56&hash=4C02DAF3732FFA53AA19AE16565081CF7F2FE819

LinkedIn.png%3Fh=56&la=en&w=56&hash=4C02DAF3732FFA53AA19AE16565081CF7F2FE819

551 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

551 ms

Glassdoor.png%3Fh=56&la=en&w=56&hash=6078375CACCBE2326CEF79A6306EDBC1F59E8BDD

Glassdoor.png%3Fh=56&la=en&w=56&hash=6078375CACCBE2326CEF79A6306EDBC1F59E8BDD

555 ms

location

location

557 ms

d

d

366 ms

d

d

463 ms

d

d

463 ms

d

d

464 ms

d

d

553 ms

d

d

464 ms

MaterialIcons-Regular.woff

MaterialIcons-Regular.woff

554 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

427 ms

background_image.jpg

background_image.jpg

541 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

540 ms

d

d

219 ms

d

d

216 ms

d

d

217 ms

d

d

216 ms

d

d

217 ms

Accessibility Review

ir.central.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ir.central.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ir.central.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ir.central.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ir.central.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ir.central.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ir Central. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: