Tools & Wizards About Us
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk

hearclear | Expert hearing health and hearing aid advice

Page Load Speed

776 ms in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

322 ms

Page Rendered

402 ms

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Liposuction Cliniccompare content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk

Visit liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 724 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.hearclear.com

52 ms

otSDKStub.js

37 ms

6e7bce70-ded1-4068-bddc-1a01fa853d29.json

52 ms

gtm.js

104 ms

hero-image-mobile.png

148 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk, 7% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 4% (1 request) were made to Hearclear.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (148 ms) relates to the external source Images.hearclear.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

590.5 kB

After Optimization

474.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk main page is 590.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 431.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 115.8 kB

  • Original 149.8 kB
  • After minification 149.8 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 256 B

  • Original 431.5 kB
  • After minification 431.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liposuction Cliniccompare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 40 B

  • Original 9.2 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liposuction Cliniccompare. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.hearclear.com

www.hearclear.com

52 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

37 ms

6e7bce70-ded1-4068-bddc-1a01fa853d29.json

6e7bce70-ded1-4068-bddc-1a01fa853d29.json

52 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

104 ms

hero-image-mobile.png

hero-image-mobile.png

148 ms

css2

css2

86 ms

oie_13142656sqDPIbHd-1.png

oie_13142656sqDPIbHd-1.png

107 ms

bitfuul-image-29.jpg

bitfuul-image-29.jpg

88 ms

bitfuul-image-26-1.jpg

bitfuul-image-26-1.jpg

98 ms

bitfuul-image-e1673414201236.jpg

bitfuul-image-e1673414201236.jpg

98 ms

AdobeStock_365456836-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_365456836-ImResizer.jpg

98 ms

bitfuul-image-3-ImResizer.jpg

bitfuul-image-3-ImResizer.jpg

98 ms

AdobeStock_141288773-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_141288773-ImResizer.jpg

102 ms

homepage-image-left-shapes.png

homepage-image-left-shapes.png

122 ms

Learn-1.svg

Learn-1.svg

98 ms

Explore-1.svg

Explore-1.svg

100 ms

Connect-1.svg

Connect-1.svg

104 ms

Appointment-1.svg

Appointment-1.svg

105 ms

AdobeStock_441791900-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_441791900-ImResizer.jpg

107 ms

bitfuul-image-18.jpg

bitfuul-image-18.jpg

108 ms

AdobeStock_278824031-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_278824031-ImResizer.jpg

108 ms

AdobeStock_365456836-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_365456836-ImResizer.jpg

120 ms

AdobeStock_479753611-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_479753611-ImResizer.jpg

109 ms

AdobeStock_141288773-ImResizer.jpg

AdobeStock_141288773-ImResizer.jpg

110 ms

Reliable-1.svg

Reliable-1.svg

111 ms

Helped-1.svg

Helped-1.svg

113 ms

Audiologists-1.svg

Audiologists-1.svg

115 ms

Medical-content-1.svg

Medical-content-1.svg

116 ms

Accessibility Review

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liposuction Cliniccompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: