Access material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com. Construction Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Construction Tech Industry

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,180 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com

139 ms

material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com

362 ms

style1.css

272 ms

bootstrap.min.css

341 ms

font-awesome.min.css

281 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com, 60% (62 requests) were made to Constructiontechreview.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) relates to the external source Constructiontechreview.com.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 570.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 79.1 kB

Original 102.4 kB
After minification 100.9 kB
After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

Original 570.6 kB
After minification 552.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Material And Cost Estimation Construction Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 56.6 kB

Original 412.7 kB
After minification 398.9 kB
After compression 356.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 195.0 kB

Original 305.6 kB
After minification 283.4 kB
After compression 110.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Material And Cost Estimation Construction Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Material And Cost Estimation Construction Tech Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Construction Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Construction Tech Industry

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

material-and-cost-estimation.constructiontechreview.com