Tools & Wizards About Us
on.click.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

on.click.org

The #1 Click Tracking Software For Online Marketers

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

950 ms

on.click.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing On Click content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about on.click.org

Click Tracking Software used by the top internet marketers, small businesses & affiliates to optimize their traffic, increase conversions and boost profits.

Visit on.click.org

Key Findings

We analyzed On.click.org page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

on.click.org performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

on.click.org

183 ms

on.click.org

624 ms

css

41 ms

css

96 ms

all.css

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original On.click.org, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain On.click.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.4 kB (10%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of On.click.org main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

  • Original 80.8 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 395.7 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. On Click images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB
  • After compression 45.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. On.click.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (35%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

48

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of On Click. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

on.click.org

on.click.org

183 ms

on.click.org

on.click.org

624 ms

css

css

41 ms

css

css

96 ms

all.css

all.css

235 ms

linear.css

linear.css

94 ms

style.css

style.css

177 ms

global.css

global.css

229 ms

stylebg.css

stylebg.css

284 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

296 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

102 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

403 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

103 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

623 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

352 ms

formvalidation.js

formvalidation.js

351 ms

w3data.js

w3data.js

150 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

350 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

352 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

352 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

361 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

440 ms

wow.css

wow.css

398 ms

wow.js

wow.js

400 ms

popup.js

popup.js

399 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

112 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

410 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

411 ms

closebutton.png

closebutton.png

256 ms

logo.png

logo.png

549 ms

p1.png

p1.png

675 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

677 ms

bg3.jpg

bg3.jpg

676 ms

real-time.png

real-time.png

549 ms

intelligent-split-testing.png

intelligent-split-testing.png

549 ms

email-opens.png

email-opens.png

677 ms

amazing-things.png

amazing-things.png

733 ms

amazing-things2.png

amazing-things2.png

982 ms

amazing-things3.png

amazing-things3.png

951 ms

amazing-things4.png

amazing-things4.png

1424 ms

traffic-target.png

traffic-target.png

733 ms

rotate-links.png

rotate-links.png

734 ms

powerful-features.png

powerful-features.png

835 ms

where-it-works.jpg

where-it-works.jpg

831 ms

where-it-works2.jpg

where-it-works2.jpg

832 ms

i8.png

i8.png

848 ms

zoomicon.png

zoomicon.png

849 ms

live-clickstream.png

live-clickstream.png

993 ms

split_testing.png

split_testing.png

1098 ms

i5.png

i5.png

918 ms

target-traffic.png

target-traffic.png

1158 ms

link-rotation.png

link-rotation.png

1016 ms

network.png

network.png

1035 ms

link-shortening-and-cloaking2.png

link-shortening-and-cloaking2.png

1048 ms

split-testing-and-tracking2.png

split-testing-and-tracking2.png

1072 ms

email-filtering2.png

email-filtering2.png

1098 ms

multiple-click-rotation-models2.png

multiple-click-rotation-models2.png

1117 ms

conversion-tracking2.png

conversion-tracking2.png

1148 ms

retargeting-pixels2.png

retargeting-pixels2.png

1162 ms

custom-branded-domains2.png

custom-branded-domains2.png

1182 ms

real-time-analytics2.png

real-time-analytics2.png

1183 ms

ewen-chia.png

ewen-chia.png

1196 ms

shawn-casey.png

shawn-casey.png

1223 ms

anik-signal.png

anik-signal.png

1222 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

322 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

322 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

445 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

449 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

448 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

502 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

156 ms

Linearicons-Free.woff

Linearicons-Free.woff

985 ms

315846752567015

315846752567015

220 ms

adam-horwitz.png

adam-horwitz.png

709 ms

willie-crawford.png

willie-crawford.png

743 ms

michael-rasmussen.png

michael-rasmussen.png

618 ms

slogos-1.png

slogos-1.png

622 ms

slogos-2.png

slogos-2.png

660 ms

down-arrows.png

down-arrows.png

677 ms

footerbg.png

footerbg.png

621 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

634 ms

arrow-left.png

arrow-left.png

634 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

550 ms

nr-1216.min.js

nr-1216.min.js

22 ms

Accessibility Review

on.click.org accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

on.click.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

on.click.org SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise On.click.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that On.click.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

on.click.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of On Click. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: