1.5 sec in total
109 ms
1.2 sec
238 ms
Visit r.retarget.compare-credit.fr now to see the best up-to-date R Retarget Compare Credit content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about r.retarget.compare-credit.fr
Grow your business with Brevo, the Email Marketing Platform that goes beyond emails with SMS, chat, and more.
Visit r.retarget.compare-credit.frWe analyzed R.retarget.compare-credit.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
r.retarget.compare-credit.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value2,710 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
109 ms
91 ms
64 ms
53 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original R.retarget.compare-credit.fr, 28% (28 requests) were made to Brevo.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (319 ms) relates to the external source Brevo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 254.4 kB (33%)
766.9 kB
512.5 kB
In fact, the total size of R.retarget.compare-credit.fr main page is 766.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 470.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 254.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 359 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R.retarget.compare-credit.fr has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (63%)
99
37
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Retarget Compare Credit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.brevo.com
109 ms
a36096b8ae12bb21.css
91 ms
ce6f6cc8c9fe1867.css
64 ms
70d118031f1cde1c.css
53 ms
913ede2223c0df44.css
85 ms
d96c62f2cb1e0d1a.css
99 ms
8d7cfb379741de72.css
73 ms
faa047b8916c6188.css
96 ms
235a336c6a861f4e.css
108 ms
fd9d1056-49a6656e65e5c038.js
103 ms
5158-64d5e5a70f178fbf.js
137 ms
main-app-cb3e64a180adb0da.js
139 ms
18967bc7-34ef22148adb196a.js
143 ms
3994-96d095d641c1ed92.js
186 ms
3489-b3d5bc0d0a7e3443.js
176 ms
3159-7156b8f5b0e02c58.js
168 ms
6785-23466a40b896a45c.js
188 ms
9297-4294d09b3491d430.js
180 ms
not-found-bfae292b1ebb5299.js
186 ms
4154-28c873c3c6c39b00.js
206 ms
6144-72d983be4b82e238.js
256 ms
6243-2de50382b39e0cf1.js
279 ms
6767-b0efa039ad35a328.js
253 ms
880-f3c5ea70dc13baae.js
280 ms
4084-7cfbe34cc9a9c32f.js
236 ms
page-37f2f2be77e04174.js
245 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
319 ms
webpack-8df1c99a12a52cbc.js
303 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
37 ms
5309a9e03cf153ec184a.css
46 ms
dt.js
301 ms
Mail-64.svg
110 ms
Message-64-1.svg
103 ms
Whatsapp-64-1.svg
78 ms
Push-Notification-64.svg
72 ms
Automation-64.svg
95 ms
Signup-forms-64.svg
78 ms
Pipeline-management-64.svg
96 ms
Personal-Meeting-64.svg
103 ms
Inbox-64.svg
93 ms
Meeting-64.svg
125 ms
Whatsapp-40px.svg
124 ms
Chat-64-1.svg
122 ms
Chatbot-64.svg
144 ms
Open-Rate-64.svg
149 ms
API-1.svg
143 ms
Message-64.svg
145 ms
Chat-64.svg
155 ms
Brevo-AI.webp
154 ms
Integrations-1.webp
195 ms
Developers.webp
187 ms
enterprise.webp
171 ms
blog-1.svg
173 ms
ebook.svg
179 ms
academy-1.svg
175 ms
events-2.svg
198 ms
email-markating.svg
217 ms
mailchimp-alternative-1.svg
209 ms
case-study.svg
219 ms
SMB.svg
211 ms
retail-ecommerce.svg
254 ms
Customer-success.svg
223 ms
Community.svg
247 ms
product-updates-green.svg
233 ms
partner-program.svg
257 ms
integrations-2.svg
285 ms
help-center-2.svg
251 ms
contact-us-1.svg
209 ms
find-expert-2.svg
195 ms
Platform-status-green.svg
212 ms
en_new_hero_image_for_tab_mob.webp
223 ms
LouisVuitton.svg
189 ms
Tissot.svg
201 ms
Bodybuilding.svg
211 ms
ebay-1.svg
220 ms
Michelin.svg
239 ms
Amnesty.svg
193 ms
MarketingPlatform-64-4.svg
194 ms
SalesCRM-64-1.svg
242 ms
Conversations-40-3.svg
199 ms
CDP-1.svg
222 ms
TransactionalEmails-64-3.svg
193 ms
lp_mkt_automation_en-2.webp
213 ms
G2-original-1.svg
211 ms
Capterra-original.svg
213 ms
Gartner-original-1.svg
238 ms
ai_camp-300x122-1.webp
231 ms
g2_leader_small_business-1.webp
217 ms
trustradius-2.webp
214 ms
g2_mid_market_leader.webp
207 ms
g2_easiest_admin.webp
216 ms
stevie-winner.webp
232 ms
g2_best_meets_requirements.webp
205 ms
stripe.webp
212 ms
am.webp
226 ms
intercom.webp
229 ms
yotpo.webp
207 ms
zoom.webp
206 ms
zendesk.webp
202 ms
n_n.webp
216 ms
r.retarget.compare-credit.fr accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
r.retarget.compare-credit.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
r.retarget.compare-credit.fr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R.retarget.compare-credit.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R.retarget.compare-credit.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
r.retarget.compare-credit.fr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Retarget Compare Credit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: