Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

readersdigest.com-sub.info

Magazine-Agent.com | Magazine-Agent.com Magazine Subscription Deals

Page Load Speed

735 ms in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

364 ms

Page Rendered

358 ms

readersdigest.com-sub.info screenshot

About Website

Welcome to readersdigest.com-sub.info homepage info - get ready to check Readersdigest Com Sub best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about readersdigest.com-sub.info

Subscribe to Magazine-Agent.com. New, Gift and Renewal Subscriptions offered at Amazing Prices, direct from Publisher.

Visit readersdigest.com-sub.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Readersdigest.com-sub.info page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 722 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readersdigest.com-sub.info performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,190 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.604

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

readersdigest.com-sub.info

13 ms

magazineagent.com-sub.info

45 ms

sync-sentry-vendor.js

5 ms

sync-main-vendor.js

11 ms

sync-main-bundle.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Readersdigest.com-sub.info, 89% (17 requests) were made to Magazineagent.com-sub.info and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (200 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 289.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Readersdigest.com-sub.info main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 155.1 kB

  • Original 178.3 kB
  • After minification 141.9 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 130.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Readersdigest Com Sub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 280.1 kB
  • After minification 280.1 kB
  • After compression 277.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 607 B

  • Original 57.0 kB
  • After minification 57.0 kB
  • After compression 56.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readersdigest.com-sub.info has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readersdigest Com Sub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

readersdigest.com-sub.info accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

SEO Factors

readersdigest.com-sub.info SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readersdigest.com-sub.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readersdigest.com-sub.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readersdigest Com Sub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: