Tools & Wizards About Us
review.cetizen.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 69

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

review.cetizen.com

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

2.6 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

611 ms

review.cetizen.com screenshot

About Website

Visit review.cetizen.com now to see the best up-to-date Review Cetizen content for South Korea and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about review.cetizen.com

Visit review.cetizen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Review.cetizen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

review.cetizen.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

review.cetizen.com

2637 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

1783 ms

reset.css

1593 ms

style.css

1591 ms

selectbox-min.js

1588 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Review.cetizen.com, 33% (29 requests) were made to Image3.cetizen.com and 28% (25 requests) were made to Image2.cetizen.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Review.cetizen.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 402.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Review.cetizen.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 176.5 kB

  • Original 209.5 kB
  • After minification 198.8 kB
  • After compression 33.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 60.0 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Cetizen images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 89.3 kB

  • Original 295.3 kB
  • After minification 289.2 kB
  • After compression 206.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.3 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 76.7 kB

  • Original 90.8 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Review.cetizen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (44%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Cetizen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

review.cetizen.com

review.cetizen.com

2637 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

1783 ms

reset.css

reset.css

1593 ms

style.css

style.css

1591 ms

selectbox-min.js

selectbox-min.js

1588 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

1596 ms

string.js

string.js

827 ms

date.js

date.js

788 ms

element.js

element.js

50 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

24 ms

cetizen_wikopure_0.jpg

cetizen_wikopure_0.jpg

1414 ms

mqdefault.jpg

mqdefault.jpg

76 ms

close.png

close.png

206 ms

ico_point.gif

ico_point.gif

205 ms

zoom.jpg

zoom.jpg

206 ms

topmenu_logo_n.png

topmenu_logo_n.png

203 ms

menu.png

menu.png

247 ms

top3.png

top3.png

245 ms

more.png

more.png

476 ms

close_btn.png

close_btn.png

476 ms

20160226_pvsp.jpg

20160226_pvsp.jpg

590 ms

20160201_a5_s6_m.jpg

20160201_a5_s6_m.jpg

476 ms

20160201_k10_sol_m.jpg

20160201_k10_sol_m.jpg

480 ms

spec_icon.png

spec_icon.png

523 ms

play_btn5.png

play_btn5.png

591 ms

camtest.jpg

camtest.jpg

1806 ms

cetizen_galaxyclub_00.jpg

cetizen_galaxyclub_00.jpg

1182 ms

cetizen_g7media_00.jpg

cetizen_g7media_00.jpg

1182 ms

cetizen_g930scam_00.jpg

cetizen_g930scam_00.jpg

1219 ms

6269_20357.png

6269_20357.png

834 ms

6269_20354.png

6269_20354.png

1227 ms

6269_20350.png

6269_20350.png

1379 ms

6280_20352.png

6280_20352.png

1378 ms

6269_20351.png

6269_20351.png

1414 ms

6280_20348.png

6280_20348.png

1429 ms

6269_20349.png

6269_20349.png

1577 ms

6270_20342.png

6270_20342.png

1579 ms

6286_20345.png

6286_20345.png

1599 ms

6301_20347.png

6301_20347.png

1611 ms

6269_20340.png

6269_20340.png

1629 ms

6269_20338.png

6269_20338.png

1771 ms

6269_20314.png

6269_20314.png

1794 ms

6270_20337.png

6270_20337.png

1793 ms

6279_20332.png

6279_20332.png

1806 ms

6278_20330.png

6278_20330.png

1831 ms

6277_20328.png

6277_20328.png

1964 ms

6038_20320.png

6038_20320.png

1987 ms

6038_20324.png

6038_20324.png

1990 ms

6268_20311.png

6268_20311.png

2013 ms

c_trust.jpg

c_trust.jpg

582 ms

c_pay.jpg

c_pay.jpg

591 ms

c_escrow.jpg

c_escrow.jpg

619 ms

c_blog.jpg

c_blog.jpg

714 ms

c_facebook.jpg

c_facebook.jpg

785 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

87 ms

main.js

main.js

111 ms

ajax_suggest.php

ajax_suggest.php

351 ms

element_main.js

element_main.js

65 ms

ca-pub-7650996104723492.js

ca-pub-7650996104723492.js

306 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

297 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

181 ms

checkbox_2.png

checkbox_2.png

603 ms

ajax_suggest.php

ajax_suggest.php

435 ms

ads

ads

403 ms

dc.js

dc.js

38 ms

osd.js

osd.js

17 ms

style.css

style.css

2020 ms

inpage_linkid.js

inpage_linkid.js

22 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

translate_24dp.png

translate_24dp.png

115 ms

l

l

65 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

102 ms

18100265067498690522

18100265067498690522

60 ms

abg.js

abg.js

72 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

143 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

60 ms

te_ctrl3.gif

te_ctrl3.gif

31 ms

googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png

googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png

71 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

70 ms

s

s

106 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

103 ms

te_bk.gif

te_bk.gif

36 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

10 ms

activeview

activeview

49 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

198 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

199 ms

close.gif

close.gif

201 ms

ui

ui

15 ms

Accessibility Review

review.cetizen.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

review.cetizen.com best practices score

69

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

review.cetizen.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EU

  • Encoding

    EUC-KR

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Review.cetizen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Basque. Our system also found out that Review.cetizen.com main page’s claimed encoding is euc-kr. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

review.cetizen.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Cetizen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: