9.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
7.8 sec
306 ms
Click here to check amazing SSL Co content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ssl.co.rs
Buy SSL & Code Signing certificates Online. Net++ technology offers Digicert, Thawte & GeoTrust SSL and Code Signing certs at prices you'll love.
Visit ssl.co.rsWe analyzed Ssl.co.rs page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ssl.co.rs performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.094
91/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
1708 ms
382 ms
36 ms
298 ms
720 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Ssl.co.rs, 8% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ssl.co.rs.
Page size can be reduced by 168.4 kB (10%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Ssl.co.rs main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SSL Co images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 227 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ssl.co.rs has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (35%)
43
28
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SSL Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
1708 ms
v_120_6faeb8d9f192d9f74b3aab860108efd6_all.css
382 ms
css
36 ms
ssl-shop-logo-1430311084.jpg
298 ms
8d9722cfa879dd4fdd78e4a652a915cad9d5607b_2.png
720 ms
0cda016f5705827feaa77a888b1efc080cf0e2fe_4.png
622 ms
d69ce56231f08210b3496e26b6bffc26471e2e1c_10.png
917 ms
5b8811f9c435a852f71e614d21b05b0e521915a6_Multi-Domain-SSL.png
715 ms
thawte-ssl-123.jpg
582 ms
thawte-ssl-web-server-with-ev-.jpg
582 ms
thawte-wildcard-ssl.jpg
701 ms
geotrust-true-businessid-ssl.jpg
736 ms
digicert-code-signing-certificate.jpg
800 ms
premium.jpg
838 ms
document-signing-organization-2000.jpg
916 ms
geotrust-true-businessid-with-ev.jpg
861 ms
geotrust-true-businessid-wildcard.jpg
867 ms
rapidssl-certificate.jpg
940 ms
206bba91208d871bdc1395a1f4515f2160843ffe_1.png
1268 ms
2a866f47518386a406c1af0197c4f3fe53a5ab40_2.png
1107 ms
820dedf6b8de0529c9ea1cd8c396643bf881889d_3.png
1106 ms
v_97_72f6c3508a09597fc1f6ba7eaf6c8944.js
1146 ms
css
21 ms
4d31a447b1592596fe638c401.js
92 ms
bg-theme6.jpg
615 ms
footer-bg.png
635 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
60 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
66 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
78 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
799 ms
embed.js
19 ms
gtm.js
142 ms
analytics.js
101 ms
piwik
3456 ms
all.js
72 ms
bx_loader.gif
204 ms
price-container-bg.png
191 ms
ec.js
9 ms
all.js
8 ms
collect
21 ms
42 ms
collect
56 ms
js
54 ms
collect
20 ms
insight.min.js
118 ms
collect
70 ms
ga-audiences
92 ms
ga-audiences
47 ms
ssl.co.rs accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ssl.co.rs best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ssl.co.rs SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssl.co.rs can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ssl.co.rs main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ssl.co.rs
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SSL Co. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: