Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stlouis.crittercontrol.com

Guaranteed Wildlife Removal Services - Critter Control of St. Louis

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

861 ms

Page Rendered

976 ms

stlouis.crittercontrol.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stlouis.crittercontrol.com homepage info - get ready to check St Louis Critter Control best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about stlouis.crittercontrol.com

Critter Control has provided humane wildlife control services in St. Louis since 1988. Specializing in humane animal trapping & wildlife removal services for squirrels, raccoons, birds, & other nuisan...

Visit stlouis.crittercontrol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stlouis.crittercontrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stlouis.crittercontrol.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stlouis.crittercontrol.com

85 ms

171 ms

svg-legend.svg

25 ms

main-logo_png_200_100.png

36 ms

chevron-right.svg

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stlouis.crittercontrol.com, 94% (30 requests) were made to Crittercontrol.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Res.cloudinary.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (264 ms) relates to the external source Crittercontrol.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Stlouis.crittercontrol.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 170.6 kB

  • Original 212.3 kB
  • After minification 194.7 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. St Louis Critter Control images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of St Louis Critter Control. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

stlouis.crittercontrol.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stlouis.crittercontrol.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stlouis.crittercontrol.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stlouis.crittercontrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stlouis.crittercontrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of St Louis Critter Control. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: