Tools & Wizards About Us
test.cedia.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

test.cedia.net

CEDIA | Global Association for the Smart Home Technology Industry

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

78 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

test.cedia.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Test CEDIA content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about test.cedia.net

CEDIA is the leading global organization for the smart home technology industry, serving more than 3,500 members from 77 countries.

Visit test.cedia.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.cedia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.cedia.net performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,670 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.cedia.net

78 ms

test.cedia.net

5145 ms

500.html

4 ms

500.html

16 ms

jquery.min.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Test.cedia.net, 66% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Test.cedia.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.1 kB (3%)

Content Size

339.6 kB

After Optimization

330.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Test.cedia.net main page is 339.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 232.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 12.6 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 232.8 kB
  • After minification 232.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Test CEDIA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 94.2 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 94.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test CEDIA. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

test.cedia.net

test.cedia.net

78 ms

test.cedia.net

test.cedia.net

5145 ms

500.html

500.html

4 ms

500.html

500.html

16 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

56 ms

css

css

79 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

76 ms

0800f092-2124-46ec-b11d-b4f48b677302.js

0800f092-2124-46ec-b11d-b4f48b677302.js

79 ms

CED_background_retouch_061520_R1.jpg

CED_background_retouch_061520_R1.jpg

62 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7jujVj9w.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7jujVj9w.woff

24 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7jujVj9_mf.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7jujVj9_mf.woff

24 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qN67jujVj9_mf.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qN67jujVj9_mf.woff

23 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qO67jujVj9_mf.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qO67jujVj9_mf.woff

25 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNK7jujVj9_mf.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNK7jujVj9_mf.woff

26 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPK7jujVj9_mf.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPK7jujVj9_mf.woff

26 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNa7jujVj9_mf.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNa7jujVj9_mf.woff

25 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo3cOWxw.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo3cOWxw.woff

28 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdo3cOWxy40.woff

27 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmBdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmBdo3cOWxy40.woff

28 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlBdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlBdo3cOWxy40.woff

29 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmxdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmxdo3cOWxy40.woff

26 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwkxdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwkxdo3cOWxy40.woff

28 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmhdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmhdo3cOWxy40.woff

29 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo3cOWxw.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo3cOWxw.woff

30 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdo3cOWxy40.woff

32 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmBdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmBdo3cOWxy40.woff

31 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlBdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlBdo3cOWxy40.woff

33 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmxdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmxdo3cOWxy40.woff

30 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwkxdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwkxdo3cOWxy40.woff

32 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmhdo3cOWxy40.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmhdo3cOWxy40.woff

32 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

18 ms

Accessibility Review

test.cedia.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

test.cedia.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

test.cedia.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.cedia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Test.cedia.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

test.cedia.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test CEDIA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: