Tools & Wizards About Us
try.chargeback.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

try.chargeback.com

AI Platform for Identity-Centric Fraud | Sift

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

139 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

try.chargeback.com screenshot

About Website

Visit try.chargeback.com now to see the best up-to-date Try Chargeback content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about try.chargeback.com

Our AI-powered platform empowers your business to expand fearlessly, mitigating concerns related to fraud without compromising the essential element of trust.

Visit try.chargeback.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Try.chargeback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

try.chargeback.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,320 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.12

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

try.chargeback.com

139 ms

try.chargeback.com

42 ms

sift.com

225 ms

gtm.js

101 ms

e2203c4d54244867.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Try.chargeback.com, 64% (56 requests) were made to Sift.com and 16% (14 requests) were made to Media.sift.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Sift.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 564.0 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Try.chargeback.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 259.0 kB

  • Original 313.7 kB
  • After minification 313.4 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 259.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 305.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Try Chargeback needs image optimization as it can save up to 305.0 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 124.6 kB
  • After minification 124.6 kB
  • After compression 124.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Try.chargeback.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (41%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Try Chargeback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

try.chargeback.com

try.chargeback.com

139 ms

try.chargeback.com

try.chargeback.com

42 ms

sift.com

sift.com

225 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

101 ms

e2203c4d54244867.css

e2203c4d54244867.css

34 ms

00e01250df19cc85.css

00e01250df19cc85.css

54 ms

a42403dc5b8c1cdf.css

a42403dc5b8c1cdf.css

54 ms

d09a4123adfbf332.css

d09a4123adfbf332.css

53 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

171 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

95 ms

webpack-2f8a5c715e947c88.js

webpack-2f8a5c715e947c88.js

76 ms

framework-97eca860951109d8.js

framework-97eca860951109d8.js

80 ms

main-a2c0de71c66d86b2.js

main-a2c0de71c66d86b2.js

80 ms

_app-8e44add3c6e1941d.js

_app-8e44add3c6e1941d.js

84 ms

b637e9a5-5fb737a0b48055d2.js

b637e9a5-5fb737a0b48055d2.js

80 ms

75fc9c18-a81e26132e35a072.js

75fc9c18-a81e26132e35a072.js

79 ms

5675-46b0182a740430bc.js

5675-46b0182a740430bc.js

88 ms

1664-550e089b680a072b.js

1664-550e089b680a072b.js

89 ms

5379-de3e4af1dcb6c486.js

5379-de3e4af1dcb6c486.js

93 ms

6417-d409b38712ca709b.js

6417-d409b38712ca709b.js

90 ms

938-1a93bb57c85c964d.js

938-1a93bb57c85c964d.js

91 ms

6410-9670b808efd6fb8c.js

6410-9670b808efd6fb8c.js

93 ms

8898-f9c72aac2fc59808.js

8898-f9c72aac2fc59808.js

94 ms

6648-61cefa6cf0c44fb8.js

6648-61cefa6cf0c44fb8.js

115 ms

543-b5341bb1b1a64ee2.js

543-b5341bb1b1a64ee2.js

112 ms

index-b8cb5e8da6553730.js

index-b8cb5e8da6553730.js

114 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

114 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

114 ms

reddit-color-logo.svg

reddit-color-logo.svg

112 ms

image

image

285 ms

image

image

290 ms

image

image

284 ms

image

image

383 ms

pills_filled.svg

pills_filled.svg

109 ms

pills_outline.svg

pills_outline.svg

279 ms

doted.svg

doted.svg

195 ms

image

image

284 ms

yellow-shadow.svg

yellow-shadow.svg

281 ms

image

image

637 ms

image

image

434 ms

shadow-blue.svg

shadow-blue.svg

286 ms

doordash-color-logo.svg

doordash-color-logo.svg

107 ms

poshmark-color-logo.svg

poshmark-color-logo.svg

110 ms

fanduel-logo-color.svg

fanduel-logo-color.svg

117 ms

patreon-color-logo.svg

patreon-color-logo.svg

114 ms

logo-color-paulas-choice-89992eda169e812c07de.svg

logo-color-paulas-choice-89992eda169e812c07de.svg

116 ms

hertz-color-logo.svg

hertz-color-logo.svg

112 ms

kickstarter-color-logo.svg

kickstarter-color-logo.svg

112 ms

nikon-black-logo.svg

nikon-black-logo.svg

117 ms

E-Commerce_Leader_Leader.svg

E-Commerce_Leader_Leader.svg

118 ms

Risk-BasedAuthenticationRBA_Leader_Enterprise_Leader.svg

Risk-BasedAuthenticationRBA_Leader_Enterprise_Leader.svg

119 ms

E-commerceFraudProtection_Leader_Mid-Market_Leader.svg

E-commerceFraudProtection_Leader_Mid-Market_Leader.svg

122 ms

FraudDetection_MomentumLeader_Leader.svg

FraudDetection_MomentumLeader_Leader.svg

120 ms

poshmark-black-logo.svg

poshmark-black-logo.svg

123 ms

shadow-yellow.svg

shadow-yellow.svg

272 ms

image

image

401 ms

image

image

254 ms

yellow-bg-stats.svg

yellow-bg-stats.svg

639 ms

image

image

372 ms

image

image

974 ms

image

image

959 ms

image

image

964 ms

image

image

622 ms

image

image

641 ms

image

image

964 ms

image

image

917 ms

image

image

968 ms

image

image

1231 ms

image

image

953 ms

play.svg

play.svg

1224 ms

shape_large_blue.png

shape_large_blue.png

960 ms

quotation-mark.svg

quotation-mark.svg

957 ms

green-border.png

green-border.png

939 ms

yellow-line.png

yellow-line.png

942 ms

7e2dcece-49bc-481b-baa9-26108c2e4d14.json

7e2dcece-49bc-481b-baa9-26108c2e4d14.json

25 ms

location

location

80 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

48 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZs.woff

21 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff

45 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

46 ms

en.json

en.json

26 ms

otFlat.json

otFlat.json

18 ms

otPcCenter.json

otPcCenter.json

23 ms

otCommonStyles.css

otCommonStyles.css

26 ms

Sift_Logo_mark_color.png

Sift_Logo_mark_color.png

142 ms

ot_close.svg

ot_close.svg

19 ms

Sift_Logo_color_on-light-BG.png

Sift_Logo_color_on-light-BG.png

22 ms

Accessibility Review

try.chargeback.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

try.chargeback.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

try.chargeback.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Try.chargeback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Try.chargeback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

try.chargeback.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Try Chargeback. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: