Tools & Wizards About Us
vifor.companyapp.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

vifor.companyapp.co.uk

Companyapp - Powerful apps for Desktop, Mobile & Web

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

674 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

110 ms

vifor.companyapp.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit vifor.companyapp.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Vifor Companyapp content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vifor.companyapp.co.uk

We help companies implement fantastic, time & money saving productivity efficiencies by delivering app-based solutions to their business challenges.

Visit vifor.companyapp.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Vifor.companyapp.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 674 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vifor.companyapp.co.uk performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,220 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vifor.companyapp.co.uk

674 ms

content-module.css

85 ms

ckeditor.css

168 ms

ui.datepicker.css

235 ms

filefield.css

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Vifor.companyapp.co.uk, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Vifor.companyapp.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 143.5 kB (75%)

Content Size

191.6 kB

After Optimization

48.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vifor.companyapp.co.uk main page is 191.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 92.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 905 B

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vifor Companyapp needs image optimization as it can save up to 905 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 87.7 kB
  • After minification 76.5 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 75.7 kB

  • Original 92.4 kB
  • After minification 59.5 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vifor.companyapp.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (91%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vifor Companyapp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vifor.companyapp.co.uk

vifor.companyapp.co.uk

674 ms

content-module.css

content-module.css

85 ms

ckeditor.css

ckeditor.css

168 ms

ui.datepicker.css

ui.datepicker.css

235 ms

filefield.css

filefield.css

235 ms

fieldgroup.css

fieldgroup.css

248 ms

ca_presenter.css

ca_presenter.css

248 ms

style_global.css

style_global.css

249 ms

html-reset.css

html-reset.css

249 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

312 ms

wireframes.css

wireframes.css

311 ms

layout-fixed.css

layout-fixed.css

330 ms

page-backgrounds.css

page-backgrounds.css

328 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

328 ms

messages.css

messages.css

330 ms

pages.css

pages.css

387 ms

block-editing.css

block-editing.css

390 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

407 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

410 ms

panels-styles.css

panels-styles.css

410 ms

views-styles.css

views-styles.css

410 ms

nodes.css

nodes.css

464 ms

comments.css

comments.css

463 ms

forms.css

forms.css

490 ms

fields.css

fields.css

492 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

573 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

572 ms

mc_multi_select.js

mc_multi_select.js

538 ms

ca_presenter.js

ca_presenter.js

536 ms

global_functions.js

global_functions.js

568 ms

main.js

main.js

568 ms

css

css

54 ms

logo-black.png

logo-black.png

84 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

25 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

27 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

36 ms

print.css

print.css

84 ms

Accessibility Review

vifor.companyapp.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vifor.companyapp.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vifor.companyapp.co.uk SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vifor.companyapp.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vifor.companyapp.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vifor.companyapp.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vifor Companyapp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: