Tools & Wizards About Us
walk.care.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

walk.care.org

Coming Soon page

Page Load Speed

228 ms in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

95 ms

Page Rendered

48 ms

walk.care.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Walk Care content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about walk.care.org

Visit walk.care.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Walk.care.org page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 143 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

walk.care.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

walk.care.org

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Walk.care.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (85 ms) belongs to the original domain Walk.care.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 358.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Walk.care.org main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 44 B

  • Original 199 B
  • After minification 187 B
  • After compression 155 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44 B or 22% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Walk Care images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 140.9 kB

  • Original 405.2 kB
  • After minification 388.6 kB
  • After compression 264.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.9 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 215.6 kB

  • Original 245.2 kB
  • After minification 80.8 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Walk.care.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

walk.care.org

walk.care.org

85 ms

Accessibility Review

walk.care.org accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

walk.care.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

walk.care.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Walk.care.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Walk.care.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

walk.care.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Walk Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: